From: Rick Jones <rick.jones2@hp.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
Cc: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
KVM <kvm@vger.kernel.org>, David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>,
jpirko@redhat.com
Subject: Re: TCP small packets throughput and multiqueue virtio-net
Date: Fri, 08 Mar 2013 09:26:14 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <513A1F36.5020401@hp.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1362755115.15793.236.camel@edumazet-glaptop>
>
> Well, the point is : if your app does write(1024) bytes, thats probably
> because it wants small packets from the very beginning. (See the TCP
> PUSH flag ?)
I think that raises the question of whether or not Jason was setting the
test-specific -D option on his TCP_STREAM tests, to have netperf make a
setsockopt(TCP_NODELAY) call.
happy benchmarking,
rick jones
> If the transport is slow, TCP stack will automatically collapse several
> write into single skbs (assuming TSO or GSO is on), and you'll see big
> GSO packets with tcpdump [1]. So TCP will help you to get less overhead
> in this case.
>
> But if transport is fast, you'll see small packets, and thats good for
> latency.
>
> So my opinion is : its exactly behaving as expected.
>
> If you want bigger packets either :
> - Make the application doing big write()
> - Slow the vmexit ;)
>
> [1] GSO fools tcpdump : Actual packets sent to the wire are not 'big
> packets', but they hit dev_hard_start_xmit() as GSO packets.
>
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-03-08 17:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-03-08 6:24 TCP small packets throughput and multiqueue virtio-net Jason Wang
2013-03-08 15:05 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-03-08 17:26 ` Rick Jones [this message]
2013-03-11 6:21 ` Jason Wang
2013-03-11 6:17 ` Jason Wang
2013-03-11 11:29 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=513A1F36.5020401@hp.com \
--to=rick.jones2@hp.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
--cc=jpirko@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stephen@networkplumber.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox