From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>
Cc: Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com>,
Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>, kvm <kvm@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: x86: Convert INIT and SIPI signals into synchronously handled events
Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2013 14:09:24 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <513F2904.2050905@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <513F23BD.7020903@siemens.com>
Il 12/03/2013 13:46, Jan Kiszka ha scritto:
>>>> >>> @@ -6178,7 +6177,13 @@ int kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_get_mpstate(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
>>>> >>> int kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_set_mpstate(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
>>>> >>> struct kvm_mp_state *mp_state)
>>>> >>> {
>>>> >>> - vcpu->arch.mp_state = mp_state->mp_state;
>>>> >>> + if (mp_state->mp_state == KVM_MP_STATE_SIPI_RECEIVED) {
>>>> >>> + if (!kvm_vcpu_has_lapic(vcpu))
>>>> >>> + return -EINVAL;
>>>> >>> + vcpu->arch.mp_state = KVM_MP_STATE_INIT_RECEIVED;
>>>> >>> + set_bit(KVM_APIC_SIPI, &vcpu->arch.apic->pending_events);
>>>> >>> + } else
>>>> >>> + vcpu->arch.mp_state = mp_state->mp_state;
>>> >>
>>> >> Should INIT_RECEIVED also be invalid without an in-kernel LAPIC?
>> >
>> > And since migration was brought up yesterday, do we need an interface to
>> > retrieve and set this?
>> >
>> > And should KVM_GET/SET_VCPU_EVENTS use the new sipi_vector in the APIC
>> > rather than the old one?
> I hope not. The idea is that the APIC events are processed before the
> migration completes. Translating events on get_mpstate should ensure this.
What about persistent state such as "an INIT has been received and
caused a vmexit, but is being latched until vmxoff"? Perhaps we could
use the top 8 bits of vcpu->arch.sipi_vector for this, they are always
shifted out when sipi_vector is used, and should be zero in all cases.
It would then be possible to reuse KVM_GET/SET_VCPU_EVENTS.
Migration support for nested VMX is still far far away, so perhaps we do
not care, but we still need a way to inject INIT from userspace.
Paolo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-03-12 13:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-03-12 11:44 [PATCH] KVM: x86: Convert INIT and SIPI signals into synchronously handled events Jan Kiszka
2013-03-12 12:06 ` Paolo Bonzini
2013-03-12 12:29 ` Gleb Natapov
2013-03-12 12:29 ` Paolo Bonzini
2013-03-12 12:46 ` Jan Kiszka
2013-03-12 12:49 ` Gleb Natapov
2013-03-12 12:52 ` Jan Kiszka
2013-03-12 12:53 ` Gleb Natapov
2013-03-12 13:09 ` Paolo Bonzini [this message]
2013-03-12 13:13 ` Jan Kiszka
2013-03-12 12:58 ` Jan Kiszka
2013-03-12 13:01 ` Jan Kiszka
2013-03-12 13:13 ` Paolo Bonzini
2013-03-12 13:16 ` Jan Kiszka
2013-03-12 13:25 ` Gleb Natapov
2013-03-12 13:27 ` Jan Kiszka
2013-03-12 13:37 ` Gleb Natapov
2013-03-13 7:39 ` Jan Kiszka
2013-03-13 9:03 ` Paolo Bonzini
2013-03-13 9:08 ` Jan Kiszka
2013-03-12 13:12 ` Gleb Natapov
2013-03-12 13:21 ` Jan Kiszka
2013-03-12 13:41 ` Gleb Natapov
2013-03-12 13:43 ` Paolo Bonzini
2013-03-12 13:52 ` Gleb Natapov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=513F2904.2050905@redhat.com \
--to=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=gleb@redhat.com \
--cc=jan.kiszka@siemens.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox