From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christopher Covington Subject: Re: [PATCH 14/29] arm64: KVM: guest one-reg interface Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2013 13:31:05 -0400 Message-ID: <513F6659.7060500@codeaurora.org> References: <1362455265-24165-1-git-send-email-marc.zyngier@arm.com> <1362455265-24165-15-git-send-email-marc.zyngier@arm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , kvm@vger.kernel.org, kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, Catalin Marinas To: Marc Zyngier Return-path: Received: from wolverine02.qualcomm.com ([199.106.114.251]:38923 "EHLO wolverine02.qualcomm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932412Ab3CLRbi (ORCPT ); Tue, 12 Mar 2013 13:31:38 -0400 In-Reply-To: <1362455265-24165-15-git-send-email-marc.zyngier@arm.com> Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Hi Marc, On 03/04/2013 10:47 PM, Marc Zyngier wrote: > Let userspace play with the guest registers. > > Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier > --- > arch/arm64/kvm/guest.c | 240 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 240 insertions(+) > create mode 100644 arch/arm64/kvm/guest.c [...] > +int __attribute_const__ kvm_target_cpu(void) > +{ > + unsigned long implementor = read_cpuid_implementor(); > + unsigned long part_number = read_cpuid_part_number(); > + > + if (implementor != ARM_CPU_IMP_ARM) > + return -EINVAL; > + > + switch (part_number) { > + case ARM_CPU_PART_AEM_V8: > + case ARM_CPU_PART_FOUNDATION: > + /* Treat the models just as an A57 for the time being */ > + case ARM_CPU_PART_CORTEX_A57: > + return KVM_ARM_TARGET_CORTEX_A57; > + default: > + return -EINVAL; > + } > +} What is the motivation behind these checks? Why not let any ARMv8 system that has EL2 host a virtualized Cortex A57 guest? [...] Thanks, Christopher -- Employee of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by the Linux Foundation