From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Marc Zyngier Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/29] arm64: KVM: Cortex-A57 specific system registers handling Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2013 10:26:25 +0000 Message-ID: <5141A5D1.9080109@arm.com> References: <1362455265-24165-1-git-send-email-marc.zyngier@arm.com> <1362455265-24165-11-git-send-email-marc.zyngier@arm.com> <5140C5BB.7010401@codeaurora.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=WINDOWS-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Cc: "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , "kvm@vger.kernel.org" , "kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu" , Catalin Marinas To: Christopher Covington Return-path: Received: from service87.mimecast.com ([91.220.42.44]:35324 "EHLO service87.mimecast.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756659Ab3CNK0a convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Thu, 14 Mar 2013 06:26:30 -0400 In-Reply-To: <5140C5BB.7010401@codeaurora.org> Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 13/03/13 18:30, Christopher Covington wrote: Hi Christopher, > I wonder if two of these registers could be handled in a generic fashion. [...] > What's A57-specific about this MPIDR behavior? [...] > What's A57-specific about this CPACR behavior? In both cases, nothing I can think of. They both should be moved to the generic sys_reg code. Thanks, M. -- Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...