public inbox for kvm@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: "Zhang, Yang Z" <yang.z.zhang@intel.com>
Cc: "kvm@vger.kernel.org" <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
	"gleb@redhat.com" <gleb@redhat.com>,
	"mtosatti@redhat.com" <mtosatti@redhat.com>,
	"Zhang, Xiantao" <xiantao.zhang@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 6/6] KVM: Use eoi to track RTC interrupt delivery status
Date: Fri, 29 Mar 2013 09:35:57 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5155526D.6010405@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <A9667DDFB95DB7438FA9D7D576C3D87E099F6A3D@SHSMSX101.ccr.corp.intel.com>

Il 29/03/2013 04:25, Zhang, Yang Z ha scritto:
> Paolo Bonzini wrote on 2013-03-26:
>> Il 22/03/2013 06:24, Yang Zhang ha scritto:
>>> +static void rtc_irq_ack_eoi(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
>>> +			struct rtc_status *rtc_status, int irq)
>>> +{
>>> +	if (irq != RTC_GSI)
>>> +		return;
>>> +
>>> +	if (test_and_clear_bit(vcpu->vcpu_id, rtc_status->dest_map))
>>> +		--rtc_status->pending_eoi;
>>> +
>>> +	WARN_ON(rtc_status->pending_eoi < 0);
>>> +}
>>
>> This is the only case where you're passing the struct rtc_status instead
>> of the struct kvm_ioapic.  Please use the latter, and make it the first
>> argument.
>>
>>> @@ -244,7 +268,14 @@ static int ioapic_deliver(struct kvm_ioapic *ioapic, int
>> irq)
>>>  	irqe.level = 1;
>>>  	irqe.shorthand = 0;
>>> -	return kvm_irq_delivery_to_apic(ioapic->kvm, NULL, &irqe, NULL);
>>> +	if (irq == RTC_GSI) {
>>> +		ret = kvm_irq_delivery_to_apic(ioapic->kvm, NULL, &irqe,
>>> +				ioapic->rtc_status.dest_map);
>>> +		ioapic->rtc_status.pending_eoi = ret;
>>
>> I think you should either add a
>>
>>     BUG_ON(ioapic->rtc_status.pending_eoi != 0);
>> or use "ioapic->rtc_status.pending_eoi += ret" (or both).
>>
> There may malicious guest to write EOI more than once. And the
> pending_eoi will be negative. But it should not be a bug. Just WARN_ON
> is enough. And we already do it in ack_eoi. So don't need to do
> duplicated thing here.

Even WARN_ON is too much if it is guest-triggerable.  But then it is
better to make it "+=", I think.

Paolo


  reply	other threads:[~2013-03-29  8:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-03-22  5:23 [PATCH v6 0/6] Use eoi to track RTC interrupt delivery status Yang Zhang
2013-03-22  5:24 ` [PATCH v6 1/6] KVM: Add vcpu info to ioapic_update_eoi() Yang Zhang
2013-03-22  5:24 ` [PATCH v6 2/6] KVM: Introduce struct rtc_status Yang Zhang
2013-03-22  5:24 ` [PATCH v6 3/6] KVM : Return destination vcpu on interrupt injection Yang Zhang
2013-03-22  7:05   ` Gleb Natapov
2013-03-22  7:50     ` Zhang, Yang Z
2013-03-22  7:57       ` Gleb Natapov
2013-03-22  5:24 ` [PATCH v6 4/6] KVM: Add reset/restore rtc_status support Yang Zhang
2013-03-26 14:04   ` Paolo Bonzini
2013-03-29  3:17     ` Zhang, Yang Z
2013-03-26 14:09   ` Paolo Bonzini
2013-03-29  3:19     ` Zhang, Yang Z
2013-03-22  5:24 ` [PATCH v6 5/6] KVM : Force vmexit with virtual interrupt delivery Yang Zhang
2013-03-22  5:24 ` [PATCH v6 6/6] KVM: Use eoi to track RTC interrupt delivery status Yang Zhang
2013-03-22  7:50   ` Gleb Natapov
2013-03-22  8:05     ` Zhang, Yang Z
2013-03-22  8:14       ` Gleb Natapov
2013-03-22  8:25         ` Zhang, Yang Z
2013-03-22  8:30           ` Gleb Natapov
2013-03-22  8:37             ` Zhang, Yang Z
2013-03-22  8:44               ` Gleb Natapov
2013-03-22  8:51                 ` Zhang, Yang Z
2013-03-22  8:54                   ` Gleb Natapov
2013-03-22 10:50                     ` Zhang, Yang Z
2013-03-24  9:20                       ` Gleb Natapov
2013-03-26 14:26                     ` Paolo Bonzini
2013-03-26 14:14   ` Paolo Bonzini
2013-03-29  3:25     ` Zhang, Yang Z
2013-03-29  8:35       ` Paolo Bonzini [this message]
2013-03-29  8:42         ` Zhang, Yang Z
2013-04-02 13:08       ` Gleb Natapov
2013-04-03  0:21         ` Zhang, Yang Z
2013-04-03  4:03           ` Gleb Natapov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5155526D.6010405@redhat.com \
    --to=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=gleb@redhat.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
    --cc=xiantao.zhang@intel.com \
    --cc=yang.z.zhang@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox