public inbox for kvm@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@web.de>
To: Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com>
Cc: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>, kvm <kvm@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: x86: Avoid busy loops over uninjectable pending APIC timers
Date: Sun, 28 Apr 2013 12:15:05 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <517CF6A9.4090500@web.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130317084705.GC11223@redhat.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1822 bytes --]

On 2013-03-17 09:47, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 16, 2013 at 09:49:07PM +0100, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>> From: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>
>>
>> If the guest didn't take the last APIC timer interrupt yet and generates
>> another one on top, e.g. via periodic mode, we do not block the VCPU
>> even if the guest state is halted. The reason is that
>> apic_has_pending_timer continues to return a non-zero value.
>>
>> Fix this busy loop by taking the IRR content for the LVT vector in
>> apic_has_pending_timer into account.
>>
> Just drop coalescing tacking for lapic interrupt. After posted interrupt
> will be merged __apic_accept_irq() will not longer return coalescing
> information, so the code will be dead anyway.

If I understood the follow-up discussion correctly, we aren't dropping
de-coalescing support yet. So how to proceed with this fix here?

Jan

> 
>> Signed-off-by: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>
>> ---
>>
>> Not a critical issue, we are looping fully interruptible, but it's ugly
>> to do so IMHO.
>>
>>  arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c |    4 +++-
>>  1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c b/arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c
>> index a8e9369..658abf5 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c
>> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c
>> @@ -1473,7 +1473,9 @@ int apic_has_pending_timer(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>>  	struct kvm_lapic *apic = vcpu->arch.apic;
>>  
>>  	if (kvm_vcpu_has_lapic(vcpu) && apic_enabled(apic) &&
>> -			apic_lvt_enabled(apic, APIC_LVTT))
>> +	    apic_lvt_enabled(apic, APIC_LVTT) &&
>> +	    !apic_test_vector(apic_lvt_vector(apic, APIC_LVTT),
>> +					      apic->regs + APIC_IRR))
>>  		return atomic_read(&apic->lapic_timer.pending);
>>  
>>  	return 0;
>> -- 
>> 1.7.3.4
> 
> --
> 			Gleb.



[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 263 bytes --]

  parent reply	other threads:[~2013-04-28 10:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-03-16 20:49 [PATCH] KVM: x86: Avoid busy loops over uninjectable pending APIC timers Jan Kiszka
2013-03-17  8:47 ` Gleb Natapov
2013-03-17 10:45   ` Jan Kiszka
2013-03-17 10:47     ` Gleb Natapov
2013-03-20 19:30       ` Marcelo Tosatti
2013-03-20 20:03         ` Marcelo Tosatti
2013-03-20 21:32           ` Gleb Natapov
2013-03-20 23:19             ` Marcelo Tosatti
2013-03-21  4:54               ` Gleb Natapov
2013-03-21 14:02                 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2013-03-21 14:18                   ` Gleb Natapov
2013-03-21 14:27                     ` Zhang, Yang Z
2013-03-21 16:27                       ` Gleb Natapov
2013-03-21 20:51                         ` Marcelo Tosatti
2013-03-21 21:13                           ` Gleb Natapov
2013-03-21 23:06                             ` Marcelo Tosatti
2013-03-22  1:50                               ` Zhang, Yang Z
2013-03-22  6:53                               ` Gleb Natapov
2013-03-22 10:43                                 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2013-03-22 11:19                                   ` Gleb Natapov
2013-03-24 10:45                                     ` Zhang, Yang Z
2013-03-24 19:03                                       ` Gleb Natapov
2013-04-28 10:15   ` Jan Kiszka [this message]
2013-04-28 10:19     ` Gleb Natapov
2013-04-28 10:20       ` Jan Kiszka
2013-04-28 10:23         ` Gleb Natapov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=517CF6A9.4090500@web.de \
    --to=jan.kiszka@web.de \
    --cc=gleb@redhat.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox