From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Marc Zyngier Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] ARM: KVM: fix use of S2_PGD_SIZE Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2013 18:59:50 +0100 Message-ID: <51800696.9060105@arm.com> References: <1367331446-28030-1-git-send-email-marc.zyngier@arm.com> <1367331446-28030-5-git-send-email-marc.zyngier@arm.com> <518004D8.80801@arm.com> <20130430175639.GA6266@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=WINDOWS-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Cc: "kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu" , linux-arm-kernel , KVM General To: Christoffer Dall Return-path: Received: from service87.mimecast.com ([91.220.42.44]:54099 "EHLO service87.mimecast.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1761192Ab3D3R7z convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Tue, 30 Apr 2013 13:59:55 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20130430175639.GA6266@gmail.com> Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 30/04/13 18:56, Christoffer Dall wrote: > On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 06:52:24PM +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote: >> On 30/04/13 18:40, Christoffer Dall wrote: >>> On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 7:17 AM, Marc Zyngier wrote: >>>> S2_PGD_SIZE describe the number of pages a used by a stage-2 PGD, >>>> not the size of the PGD. >>>> >>>> Fix the VM_BUG_ON() call that doesn't check much when S2_PGD_SIZE >>>> is equal to 1. >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier >>>> --- >>>> arch/arm/kvm/mmu.c | 2 +- >>>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) >>>> >>>> diff --git a/arch/arm/kvm/mmu.c b/arch/arm/kvm/mmu.c >>>> index b978ebe..09ece5c 100644 >>>> --- a/arch/arm/kvm/mmu.c >>>> +++ b/arch/arm/kvm/mmu.c >>>> @@ -377,7 +377,7 @@ int kvm_alloc_stage2_pgd(struct kvm *kvm) >>>> return -ENOMEM; >>>> >>>> /* stage-2 pgd must be aligned to its size */ >>>> - VM_BUG_ON((unsigned long)pgd & (S2_PGD_SIZE - 1)); >>>> + VM_BUG_ON((unsigned long)pgd & (PAGE_SIZE * S2_PGD_SIZE - 1)); >>> >>> I think the define is broken and should be fixed and/or renamed instead. >> >> To be fair, I wouldn't mind the whole check to be dropped altogether. If >> __get_free_pages doesn't give you an aligned allocation, the whole >> kernel is going the way of the dodo, and we shouldn't really care... >> >> Your call, really. >> > Yeah, this is from way back when, where the whole thing was different > and we were debugging all sorts of issues, so we can get rid of both the > check and the define in stead. Want to take care of it as part of your > series? Sure. I'll kill it when I repost the series. M. -- Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...