From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: "tiejun.chen" <tiejun.chen@windriver.com>
Subject: Re: [v1][KVM][PATCH 1/1] kvm:ppc:booehv: direct ISI exception to
 Guest
Date: Wed, 8 May 2013 09:53:50 +0800
Message-ID: <5189B02E.3000109@windriver.com>
References: <1367970043.3398.39@snotra>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: <agraf@suse.de>, <kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org>, <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>
To: Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com>
Return-path: <kvm-ppc-owner@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <1367970043.3398.39@snotra>
Sender: kvm-ppc-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: kvm.vger.kernel.org

On 05/08/2013 07:40 AM, Scott Wood wrote:
> On 05/07/2013 06:06:30 AM, Tiejun Chen wrote:
>> We also can direct ISI exception to Guest like DSI.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Tiejun Chen <tiejun.chen@windriver.com>
>> ---
>>  arch/powerpc/kvm/booke_emulate.c |    3 +++
>>  arch/powerpc/kvm/e500mc.c        |    3 ++-
>>  2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> Are you seeing a real performance improvement from this?  This will interfere

No. But after we reduce the exit to host, shouldn't this improve performance?

> somewhat with using the VF bit, if we were to ever do so, since VF only affects

Sorry, what is the VF you said?

Tiejun