From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Xiao Guangrong Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: x86: fix missed memory synchronization when patch hypercall Date: Sun, 09 Jun 2013 17:29:37 +0800 Message-ID: <51B44B01.7050304@gmail.com> References: <51B2A1D9.6060306@gmail.com> <20130609084526.GH4725@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Paolo Bonzini , Marcelo Tosatti , LKML , KVM To: Gleb Natapov Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20130609084526.GH4725@redhat.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: kvm.vger.kernel.org On 06/09/2013 04:45 PM, Gleb Natapov wrote: > +static int emulator_fix_hypercall(struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt) > +{ > + struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu = emul_to_vcpu(ctxt); > + return kvm_exec_with_stopped_vcpu(vcpu->kvm, > + emulator_fix_hypercall_cb, ctxt); > +} > + > + > /* > * Check if userspace requested an interrupt window, and that the > * interrupt window is open. > @@ -5761,6 +5769,10 @@ static int vcpu_enter_guest(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) > kvm_deliver_pmi(vcpu); > if (kvm_check_request(KVM_REQ_SCAN_IOAPIC, vcpu)) > vcpu_scan_ioapic(vcpu); > + if (kvm_check_request(KVM_REQ_STOP_VCPU, vcpu)){ > + mutex_lock(&vcpu->kvm->lock); > + mutex_unlock(&vcpu->kvm->lock); We should execute a serializing instruction here? > --- a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c > +++ b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c > @@ -222,6 +222,18 @@ void kvm_make_scan_ioapic_request(struct kvm *kvm) > make_all_cpus_request(kvm, KVM_REQ_SCAN_IOAPIC); > } > > +int kvm_exec_with_stopped_vcpu(struct kvm *kvm, int (*cb)(void *), void *data) > +{ > + int r; > + > + mutex_lock(&kvm->lock); > + make_all_cpus_request(kvm, KVM_REQ_STOP_VCPU); > + r = cb(data); And here?