From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com>
Cc: Takuya Yoshikawa <takuya.yoshikawa@gmail.com>,
Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong.eric@gmail.com>,
Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
avi.kivity@gmail.com, mtosatti@redhat.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/6] KVM: MMU: fast invalidate all mmio sptes
Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2013 13:08:10 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <51C1911A.3000507@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130610170341.GJ29022@redhat.com>
Il 10/06/2013 19:03, Gleb Natapov ha scritto:
> On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 10:43:52PM +0900, Takuya Yoshikawa wrote:
>> On Mon, 10 Jun 2013 16:39:37 +0800
>> Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong.eric@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On 06/10/2013 03:56 PM, Gleb Natapov wrote:
>>>> On Fri, Jun 07, 2013 at 04:51:22PM +0800, Xiao Guangrong wrote:
>>
>>>> Looks good to me, but doesn't tis obsolete kvm_mmu_zap_mmio_sptes() and
>>>> sp->mmio_cached, so they should be removed as part of the patch series?
>>>
>>> Yes, i agree, they should be removed. :)
>>
>> I'm fine with removing it but please make it clear that you all agree
>> on the same basis.
>>
>> Last time, Paolo mentioned the possibility to use some bits of spte for
>> other things. The suggestion there was to keep sp->mmio_cached code
>> for the time we would need to reduce the bits for generation numbers.
>>
>> Do you think that zap_all() is now preemptible and can treat the
>> situation reasonably well as the current kvm_mmu_zap_mmio_sptes()?
>>
>> One downside is the need to zap unrelated shadow pages, but if this case
>> is really very rare, yes I agree, it should not be a problem: it depends
>> on how many bits we can use.
>>
>> Just please reconfirm.
>>
> That was me who mention the possibility to use some bits of spte for
> other things. But for now I have a use for one bit only. Now that you
> have reminded me about that discussion I am not so sure we want to
> remove kvm_mmu_zap_mmio_sptes(), but on the other hand it is non
> preemptable, so large number of mmio sptes can cause soft lockups.
> zap_all() is better in this regards now.
I asked Gleb on IRC, and he's fine with applying patch 7 too (otherwise
there's hardly any benefit, because kvm_mmu_zap_mmio_sptes is
non-preemptable).
I'm also changing the -13 to -150 since it's quite easy to generate 150
calls to KVM_SET_USER_MEMORY_REGION. Using QEMU, and for a pretty basic
guest with virtio-net, IDE controller and VGA you get:
- 9-10 calls before starting the guest, depending on the guest memory size
- around 25 during the BIOS
- around 20 during kernel boot
- 34 during a single dump of the 64 KB ROM from a virtio-net device.
Paolo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-06-19 11:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-06-07 8:51 [PATCH v3 0/6] KVM: MMU: fast invalidate all mmio sptes Xiao Guangrong
2013-06-07 8:51 ` [PATCH v3 1/6] KVM: MMU: retain more available bits on mmio spte Xiao Guangrong
2013-06-07 8:51 ` [PATCH v3 2/6] KVM: MMU: store generation-number into " Xiao Guangrong
2013-06-07 8:51 ` [PATCH v3 3/6] KVM: MMU: make return value of mmio page fault handler more readable Xiao Guangrong
2013-06-10 7:57 ` Gleb Natapov
2013-06-10 8:45 ` Xiao Guangrong
2013-06-10 13:16 ` Takuya Yoshikawa
2013-06-11 9:18 ` Gleb Natapov
2013-06-07 8:51 ` [PATCH v3 4/6] KVM: MMU: fast invalidate all mmio sptes Xiao Guangrong
2013-06-27 8:29 ` Gleb Natapov
2013-06-27 9:01 ` Gleb Natapov
2013-06-27 9:14 ` Gleb Natapov
2013-06-27 9:21 ` Gleb Natapov
2013-06-27 9:50 ` Xiao Guangrong
2013-06-27 10:19 ` Gleb Natapov
2013-06-27 11:05 ` Xiao Guangrong
2013-06-27 11:10 ` Gleb Natapov
2013-06-07 8:51 ` [PATCH v3 5/6] KVM: MMU: add tracepoint for check_mmio_spte Xiao Guangrong
2013-06-07 8:51 ` [PATCH v3 6/6] KVM: MMU: init kvm generation close to mmio wrap-around value Xiao Guangrong
2013-06-10 7:56 ` [PATCH v3 0/6] KVM: MMU: fast invalidate all mmio sptes Gleb Natapov
2013-06-10 8:39 ` Xiao Guangrong
2013-06-10 13:43 ` Takuya Yoshikawa
2013-06-10 17:03 ` Gleb Natapov
2013-06-19 11:08 ` Paolo Bonzini [this message]
2013-06-19 11:27 ` Xiao Guangrong
2013-06-14 0:08 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2013-06-15 2:22 ` Takuya Yoshikawa
2013-06-17 11:59 ` Xiao Guangrong
2013-06-18 22:21 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2013-06-18 14:26 ` Paolo Bonzini
2013-06-19 2:47 ` Xiao Guangrong
2013-06-19 17:40 ` Paolo Bonzini
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=51C1911A.3000507@redhat.com \
--to=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=avi.kivity@gmail.com \
--cc=gleb@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
--cc=takuya.yoshikawa@gmail.com \
--cc=xiaoguangrong.eric@gmail.com \
--cc=xiaoguangrong@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).