From: "tiejun.chen" <tiejun.chen@windriver.com>
To: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Cc: Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com>,
Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>,
"<kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org>" <kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org>,
"<kvm@vger.kernel.org> list" <kvm@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [v1][PATCH 1/1] KVM: PPC: disable preemption when using hard_irq_disable()
Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2013 11:03:56 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <51E3669C.7050206@windriver.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1373856444.19894.323.camel@pasglop>
On 07/15/2013 10:47 AM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> On Mon, 2013-07-15 at 10:20 +0800, tiejun.chen wrote:
>> What about SOFT_IRQ_DISABLE? This is close to name
>> hard_irq_disable() :) And
>> then remove all DISABLE_INTS as well?
>
> Or RECONCILE_IRQ_STATE...
But sounds this doesn't imply this key point that the soft-irq is always
disabled here :)
And as I understand, the irq state is always needed to be reconciled when we
disable soft irq, right?
Tiejun
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-07-15 3:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <1373651433.8183.276@snotra>
2013-07-12 23:05 ` [v1][PATCH 1/1] KVM: PPC: disable preemption when using hard_irq_disable() Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2013-07-15 2:20 ` tiejun.chen
2013-07-15 2:47 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2013-07-15 3:03 ` tiejun.chen [this message]
[not found] ` <1373909248.8183.303@snotra>
2013-07-16 2:15 ` tiejun.chen
2013-07-15 2:25 ` tiejun.chen
[not found] <1373559480.8183.258@snotra>
2013-07-12 0:30 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
[not found] ` <FB21594A-C233-4A97-8503-E2A1275F8F17@suse.de>
[not found] ` <1373560585.8183.261@snotra>
2013-07-12 3:22 ` tiejun.chen
2013-07-10 6:02 Tiejun Chen
2013-07-10 9:49 ` Alexander Graf
2013-07-11 2:48 ` tiejun.chen
2013-07-11 9:49 ` Alexander Graf
2013-07-11 12:28 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2013-07-11 12:47 ` Alexander Graf
2013-07-11 12:54 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2013-07-11 13:07 ` Alexander Graf
2013-07-12 0:19 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2013-07-12 2:13 ` tiejun.chen
2013-07-12 3:57 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2013-07-12 4:54 ` tiejun.chen
2013-07-14 4:13 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2013-07-15 3:04 ` tiejun.chen
2013-07-10 19:15 ` Scott Wood
2013-07-11 3:00 ` tiejun.chen
2013-07-11 14:13 ` Scott Wood
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=51E3669C.7050206@windriver.com \
--to=tiejun.chen@windriver.com \
--cc=agraf@suse.de \
--cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=scottwood@freescale.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).