public inbox for kvm@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, Jun Nakajima <jun.nakajima@intel.com>,
	Yang Zhang <yang.z.zhang@intel.com>,
	pbonzini@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 11/14] nEPT: MMU context for nested EPT
Date: Thu, 01 Aug 2013 17:16:07 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <51FA2757.2030602@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1375282131-9713-12-git-send-email-gleb@redhat.com>

On 07/31/2013 10:48 PM, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> From: Nadav Har'El <nyh@il.ibm.com>
> 
> KVM's existing shadow MMU code already supports nested TDP. To use it, we
> need to set up a new "MMU context" for nested EPT, and create a few callbacks
> for it (nested_ept_*()). This context should also use the EPT versions of
> the page table access functions (defined in the previous patch).
> Then, we need to switch back and forth between this nested context and the
> regular MMU context when switching between L1 and L2 (when L1 runs this L2
> with EPT).

This patch looks good to me.

Reviewed-by: Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

But i am confused that update_permission_bitmask() is not adjusted in this
series. That function depends on kvm_read_cr4_bits(X86_CR4_SMEP) and
is_write_protection(), these two functions should read the registers from
L2 guest, using the L2 status to check L1's page table seems strange.
The same issue is in nested npt. Anything i missed?


  reply	other threads:[~2013-08-01  9:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-07-31 14:48 [PATCH v5 00/14] Nested EPT Gleb Natapov
2013-07-31 14:48 ` [PATCH v5 01/14] nEPT: Support LOAD_IA32_EFER entry/exit controls for L1 Gleb Natapov
2013-08-01 11:22   ` Orit Wasserman
2013-07-31 14:48 ` [PATCH v5 02/14] nEPT: Fix cr3 handling in nested exit and entry Gleb Natapov
2013-08-01 11:28   ` Orit Wasserman
2013-07-31 14:48 ` [PATCH v5 03/14] nEPT: Fix wrong test in kvm_set_cr3 Gleb Natapov
2013-08-01 12:07   ` Orit Wasserman
2013-07-31 14:48 ` [PATCH v5 04/14] nEPT: Move common code to paging_tmpl.h Gleb Natapov
2013-07-31 14:48 ` [PATCH v5 05/14] nEPT: make guest's A/D bits depends on guest's paging mode Gleb Natapov
2013-08-01  6:51   ` Xiao Guangrong
2013-07-31 14:48 ` [PATCH v5 06/14] nEPT: Support shadow paging for guest paging without A/D bits Gleb Natapov
2013-08-01  6:54   ` Xiao Guangrong
2013-07-31 14:48 ` [PATCH v5 07/14] nEPT: Add EPT tables support to paging_tmpl.h Gleb Natapov
2013-08-01  7:00   ` Xiao Guangrong
2013-08-01  7:10     ` Gleb Natapov
2013-08-01  7:18       ` Xiao Guangrong
2013-08-01  7:31         ` Xiao Guangrong
2013-08-01  7:42           ` Gleb Natapov
2013-08-01  7:51             ` Xiao Guangrong
2013-08-01  7:56               ` Gleb Natapov
2013-08-01 11:05               ` Paolo Bonzini
2013-08-01 11:07                 ` Gleb Natapov
2013-07-31 14:48 ` [PATCH v5 08/14] nEPT: Redefine EPT-specific link_shadow_page() Gleb Natapov
2013-08-01  7:24   ` Xiao Guangrong
2013-08-01  7:27     ` Gleb Natapov
2013-07-31 14:48 ` [PATCH v5 09/14] nEPT: Nested INVEPT Gleb Natapov
2013-07-31 14:48 ` [PATCH v5 10/14] nEPT: Add nEPT violation/misconfigration support Gleb Natapov
2013-08-01  8:31   ` Xiao Guangrong
2013-08-01  8:45     ` Gleb Natapov
2013-08-01 11:19       ` Paolo Bonzini
2013-08-01 11:47         ` Gleb Natapov
2013-08-01 12:03           ` Paolo Bonzini
2013-08-01 12:14             ` Gleb Natapov
2013-08-01 13:13               ` Paolo Bonzini
2013-08-01 13:20                 ` Gleb Natapov
2013-07-31 14:48 ` [PATCH v5 11/14] nEPT: MMU context for nested EPT Gleb Natapov
2013-08-01  9:16   ` Xiao Guangrong [this message]
2013-08-01  9:37     ` Gleb Natapov
2013-08-01  9:51     ` Xiao Guangrong
2013-07-31 14:48 ` [PATCH v5 12/14] nEPT: Advertise EPT to L1 Gleb Natapov
2013-07-31 14:48 ` [PATCH v5 13/14] nEPT: Some additional comments Gleb Natapov
2013-07-31 14:48 ` [PATCH v5 14/14] nEPT: Miscelleneous cleanups Gleb Natapov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=51FA2757.2030602@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --to=xiaoguangrong@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=gleb@redhat.com \
    --cc=jun.nakajima@intel.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=yang.z.zhang@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox