kvm.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@web.de>
To: Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com>
Cc: Arthur Chunqi Li <yzt356@gmail.com>, kvm <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
	Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Jun Nakajima <jun.nakajima@intel.com>,
	Yang Zhang <yang.z.zhang@intel.com>,
	Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 01/15] nEPT: Support LOAD_IA32_EFER entry/exit controls for L1
Date: Tue, 06 Aug 2013 10:18:17 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5200B149.80601@web.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130806080051.GB8218@redhat.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3987 bytes --]

On 2013-08-06 10:00, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 06, 2013 at 09:55:09AM +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>> On 2013-08-06 09:51, Gleb Natapov wrote:
>>> On Tue, Aug 06, 2013 at 09:47:23AM +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>>>> On 2013-08-05 13:40, Gleb Natapov wrote:
>>>>> On Mon, Aug 05, 2013 at 07:27:33PM +0800, Arthur Chunqi Li wrote:
>>>>>> On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 4:07 PM, Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com> wrote:
>>>>>>> From: Nadav Har'El <nyh@il.ibm.com>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Recent KVM, since http://kerneltrap.org/mailarchive/linux-kvm/2010/5/2/6261577
>>>>>>> switch the EFER MSR when EPT is used and the host and guest have different
>>>>>>> NX bits. So if we add support for nested EPT (L1 guest using EPT to run L2)
>>>>>>> and want to be able to run recent KVM as L1, we need to allow L1 to use this
>>>>>>> EFER switching feature.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> To do this EFER switching, KVM uses VM_ENTRY/EXIT_LOAD_IA32_EFER if available,
>>>>>>> and if it isn't, it uses the generic VM_ENTRY/EXIT_MSR_LOAD. This patch adds
>>>>>>> support for the former (the latter is still unsupported).
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Nested entry and exit emulation (prepare_vmcs_02 and load_vmcs12_host_state,
>>>>>>> respectively) already handled VM_ENTRY/EXIT_LOAD_IA32_EFER correctly. So all
>>>>>>> that's left to do in this patch is to properly advertise this feature to L1.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Note that vmcs12's VM_ENTRY/EXIT_LOAD_IA32_EFER are emulated by L0, by using
>>>>>>> vmx_set_efer (which itself sets one of several vmcs02 fields), so we always
>>>>>>> support this feature, regardless of whether the host supports it.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Reviewed-by: Orit Wasserman <owasserm@redhat.com>
>>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Nadav Har'El <nyh@il.ibm.com>
>>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Jun Nakajima <jun.nakajima@intel.com>
>>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Xinhao Xu <xinhao.xu@intel.com>
>>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Yang Zhang <yang.z.zhang@Intel.com>
>>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com>
>>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>>  arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c |   23 ++++++++++++++++-------
>>>>>>>  1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
>>>>>>> index e999dc7..27efa6a 100644
>>>>>>> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
>>>>>>> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
>>>>>>> @@ -2198,7 +2198,8 @@ static __init void nested_vmx_setup_ctls_msrs(void)
>>>>>>>  #else
>>>>>>>         nested_vmx_exit_ctls_high = 0;
>>>>>>>  #endif
>>>>>>> -       nested_vmx_exit_ctls_high |= VM_EXIT_ALWAYSON_WITHOUT_TRUE_MSR;
>>>>>>> +       nested_vmx_exit_ctls_high |= (VM_EXIT_ALWAYSON_WITHOUT_TRUE_MSR |
>>>>>>> +                                     VM_EXIT_LOAD_IA32_EFER);
>>>>>> Gleb, why we don't need to check whether host supports
>>>>>> VM_EXIT_LOAD_IA32_EFER here, as what you noted in my
>>>>>> VM_EXIT_LOAD_IA32_PAT patch?
>>>>> Nested VMX completely emulates the capability.
>>>>
>>>> No, it doesn't. The values for host/guest are handled over via the
>>>> corresponding VMCS fields, physically, even though the actual loading is
>>>> emulated then. So we must not expose this feature unconditionally.
>>> Can you show me the code where it happens?
>>
>> When the guest writes to HOST/GUEST_IA32_EFER, we will store this in the
>> vmcs that will then become the active one on next L1/L2 entry, no?
>>
> Guest writes are stored in vmcs12 which is not HW vmcs, just a format
> kvm uses internally (see vmcs12_write_any). During guest entry vmcs02 
> is constructed from vmcs12 (see prepare_vmcs02) and this function does
> not access HOST/GUEST_IA32_EFER directly, it uses vmx_set_efer instead
> which takes care of things. Same function access GUEST_IA32_PAT directly
> though.

OK, right.

Is it also safe to write to any field of a shadow VMCS? That's currently
hypothetical, but what if the host supports shadowing but not EFER
loading? I don't see a technical reason but also no clear statement in
the SDM regarding this scenario.

Jan



[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 263 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2013-08-06  8:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-08-05  8:07 [PATCH v7 00/15] Nested EPT Gleb Natapov
2013-08-05  8:07 ` [PATCH v7 01/15] nEPT: Support LOAD_IA32_EFER entry/exit controls for L1 Gleb Natapov
2013-08-05 11:27   ` Arthur Chunqi Li
2013-08-05 11:40     ` Gleb Natapov
2013-08-06  7:47       ` Jan Kiszka
2013-08-06  7:51         ` Gleb Natapov
2013-08-06  7:55           ` Jan Kiszka
2013-08-06  8:00             ` Gleb Natapov
2013-08-06  8:18               ` Jan Kiszka [this message]
2013-08-06  8:24                 ` Gleb Natapov
2013-08-05 11:48     ` Paolo Bonzini
2013-08-05 12:05       ` Gleb Natapov
2013-08-05  8:07 ` [PATCH v7 02/15] nEPT: Fix cr3 handling in nested exit and entry Gleb Natapov
2013-08-05  8:07 ` [PATCH v7 03/15] nEPT: Fix wrong test in kvm_set_cr3 Gleb Natapov
2013-08-05  8:07 ` [PATCH v7 04/15] nEPT: Move common code to paging_tmpl.h Gleb Natapov
2013-08-05  8:07 ` [PATCH v7 05/15] nEPT: make guest's A/D bits depends on guest's paging mode Gleb Natapov
2013-08-05  8:07 ` [PATCH v7 06/15] nEPT: Support shadow paging for guest paging without A/D bits Gleb Natapov
2013-08-05  8:07 ` [PATCH v7 07/15] nEPT: Add EPT tables support to paging_tmpl.h Gleb Natapov
2013-08-05  8:07 ` [PATCH v7 08/15] nEPT: Redefine EPT-specific link_shadow_page() Gleb Natapov
2013-08-05  8:07 ` [PATCH v7 09/15] nEPT: correctly check if remote tlb flush is needed for shadowed EPT tables Gleb Natapov
2013-08-05  8:07 ` [PATCH v7 10/15] nEPT: Add nEPT violation/misconfigration support Gleb Natapov
2013-08-06  8:01   ` Jan Kiszka
2013-08-06  9:00   ` Gleb Natapov
2013-08-05  8:07 ` [PATCH v7 11/15] nEPT: MMU context for nested EPT Gleb Natapov
2013-08-05  8:07 ` [PATCH v7 12/15] nEPT: Nested INVEPT Gleb Natapov
2013-08-05  8:53   ` Xiao Guangrong
2013-08-05  8:07 ` [PATCH v7 13/15] nEPT: Advertise EPT to L1 Gleb Natapov
2013-08-06  8:20   ` Jan Kiszka
2013-08-06  9:02   ` Gleb Natapov
2013-08-05  8:07 ` [PATCH v7 14/15] nEPT: Some additional comments Gleb Natapov
2013-08-05  8:07 ` [PATCH v7 15/15] nEPT: Miscelleneous cleanups Gleb Natapov
2013-08-07 14:07 ` [PATCH v7 00/15] Nested EPT Paolo Bonzini

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5200B149.80601@web.de \
    --to=jan.kiszka@web.de \
    --cc=gleb@redhat.com \
    --cc=jun.nakajima@intel.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=xiaoguangrong@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=yang.z.zhang@intel.com \
    --cc=yzt356@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).