From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Subject: kvm/queue still ahead of kvm/next
Date: Fri, 09 Aug 2013 21:26:32 +0200
Message-ID: <52054268.4010909@redhat.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: "kvm@vger.kernel.org" <kvm@vger.kernel.org>
Return-path: <kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mail-qc0-f182.google.com ([209.85.216.182]:33466 "EHLO
	mail-qc0-f182.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1030765Ab3HIT1I (ORCPT <rfc822;kvm@vger.kernel.org>);
	Fri, 9 Aug 2013 15:27:08 -0400
Received: by mail-qc0-f182.google.com with SMTP id c11so2377938qcv.13
        for <kvm@vger.kernel.org>; Fri, 09 Aug 2013 12:27:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from yakj.usersys.redhat.com (net-2-39-8-162.cust.dsl.vodafone.it. [2.39.8.162])
        by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id h4sm24186986qai.6.2013.08.09.12.27.05
        for <kvm@vger.kernel.org>
        (version=TLSv1 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128);
        Fri, 09 Aug 2013 12:27:06 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <kvm.vger.kernel.org>

Hi all,

I'm seeing some breakage of shadow-on-shadow and shadow-on-EPT nested
VMX.  Until I can track more precisely whether it is a regression, and
on which hosts I can reproduce it, I'm going to leave the patches out of
kvm/next.

The good news is that nested EPT works pretty well. :)

Paolo