From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Paolo Bonzini Subject: Re: kvm/queue still ahead of kvm/next Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2013 11:26:08 +0200 Message-ID: <5211E4B0.2020808@redhat.com> References: <52054268.4010909@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "kvm@vger.kernel.org" To: Kashyap Chamarthy Return-path: Received: from mail-wi0-f175.google.com ([209.85.212.175]:36309 "EHLO mail-wi0-f175.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751113Ab3HSJ0v (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 Aug 2013 05:26:51 -0400 Received: by mail-wi0-f175.google.com with SMTP id hq12so2831754wib.14 for ; Mon, 19 Aug 2013 02:26:50 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Il 19/08/2013 06:36, Kashyap Chamarthy ha scritto: > On Sat, Aug 10, 2013 at 12:56 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote: >> > >> > Hi all, >> > >> > I'm seeing some breakage of shadow-on-shadow and shadow-on-EPT nested >> > VMX. Until I can track more precisely whether it is a regression, and >> > on which hosts I can reproduce it, I'm going to leave the patches out of >> > kvm/next. >> > >> > The good news is that nested EPT works pretty well. :) > > Paolo/others, I'm trying to test nEPT, so I'm trying to start this way: > > $ git clone git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/virt/kvm/kvm.git > $ git branch --all > $ git checkout remotes/origin/queue > > Compile, and proceed. > > Or would you suggest to use > > http://git.kiszka.org/?p=kvm-kmod.git;a=blob;f=README > > to test latest stuff? If you prefer not to build your own kernel, kvm-kmod works too. However, please build it with the latest 3.10.x kernel to make the environment as similar as possible to what you'd get with kvm.git. Paolo