From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: kvm/queue still ahead of kvm/next
Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2013 18:06:14 +0200
Message-ID: <521393F6.6090502@redhat.com>
References: <52054268.4010909@redhat.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: "kvm@vger.kernel.org" <kvm@vger.kernel.org>
To: unlisted-recipients:; (no To-header on input)
Return-path: <kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mail-wi0-f177.google.com ([209.85.212.177]:36398 "EHLO
	mail-wi0-f177.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1751097Ab3HTQG6 (ORCPT <rfc822;kvm@vger.kernel.org>);
	Tue, 20 Aug 2013 12:06:58 -0400
Received: by mail-wi0-f177.google.com with SMTP id hq12so611559wib.16
        for <kvm@vger.kernel.org>; Tue, 20 Aug 2013 09:06:57 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <52054268.4010909@redhat.com>
Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <kvm.vger.kernel.org>

Il 09/08/2013 21:26, Paolo Bonzini ha scritto:
> Hi all,
> 
> I'm seeing some breakage of shadow-on-shadow and shadow-on-EPT nested
> VMX.  Until I can track more precisely whether it is a regression, and
> on which hosts I can reproduce it, I'm going to leave the patches out of
> kvm/next.
> 
> The good news is that nested EPT works pretty well. :)

Yeah, shadow-on-EPT doesn't work on at least the Westmere I tried, so
I'll merge kvm/queue to kvm/next soon.

Paolo