* Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] linux-headers: update to 3.11 [not found] <1378196857-27541-1-git-send-email-aik@ozlabs.ru> @ 2013-09-03 9:29 ` Peter Maydell 2013-09-03 9:32 ` Alexey Kardashevskiy 0 siblings, 1 reply; 15+ messages in thread From: Peter Maydell @ 2013-09-03 9:29 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Alexey Kardashevskiy Cc: QEMU Developers, QEMU Trivial, Michael Tokarev, Gleb Natapov, Paolo Bonzini, kvm-devel On 3 September 2013 09:27, Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik@ozlabs.ru> wrote: > Signed-off-by: Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik@ozlabs.ru> > --- > > I need this update as VFIO on PPC64/pseries got in upstream kernel > and this is required by VFIO-SPAPR bits in QEMU. Others may find this > update useful too :) > --- > linux-headers/asm-arm64/kvm.h | 168 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > linux-headers/asm-arm64/kvm_para.h | 1 + > linux-headers/asm-mips/kvm.h | 81 +++++++++-------- > linux-headers/linux/kvm.h | 3 + > linux-headers/linux/vfio.h | 42 ++++++++- > linux-headers/linux/virtio_config.h | 3 + > 6 files changed, 254 insertions(+), 44 deletions(-) > create mode 100644 linux-headers/asm-arm64/kvm.h > create mode 100644 linux-headers/asm-arm64/kvm_para.h I think this should go in via the KVM tree, not trivial. thanks -- PMM ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] linux-headers: update to 3.11 2013-09-03 9:29 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] linux-headers: update to 3.11 Peter Maydell @ 2013-09-03 9:32 ` Alexey Kardashevskiy 2013-09-03 10:42 ` Jan Kiszka 0 siblings, 1 reply; 15+ messages in thread From: Alexey Kardashevskiy @ 2013-09-03 9:32 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Peter Maydell Cc: QEMU Developers, QEMU Trivial, Michael Tokarev, Gleb Natapov, Paolo Bonzini, kvm-devel On 09/03/2013 07:29 PM, Peter Maydell wrote: > On 3 September 2013 09:27, Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik@ozlabs.ru> wrote: >> Signed-off-by: Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik@ozlabs.ru> >> --- >> >> I need this update as VFIO on PPC64/pseries got in upstream kernel >> and this is required by VFIO-SPAPR bits in QEMU. Others may find this >> update useful too :) >> --- >> linux-headers/asm-arm64/kvm.h | 168 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >> linux-headers/asm-arm64/kvm_para.h | 1 + >> linux-headers/asm-mips/kvm.h | 81 +++++++++-------- >> linux-headers/linux/kvm.h | 3 + >> linux-headers/linux/vfio.h | 42 ++++++++- >> linux-headers/linux/virtio_config.h | 3 + >> 6 files changed, 254 insertions(+), 44 deletions(-) >> create mode 100644 linux-headers/asm-arm64/kvm.h >> create mode 100644 linux-headers/asm-arm64/kvm_para.h > > I think this should go in via the KVM tree, not trivial. I do not mind, it just went through the trivial tree last time, that's it. -- Alexey ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] linux-headers: update to 3.11 2013-09-03 9:32 ` Alexey Kardashevskiy @ 2013-09-03 10:42 ` Jan Kiszka 2013-09-03 15:28 ` Alexey Kardashevskiy 0 siblings, 1 reply; 15+ messages in thread From: Jan Kiszka @ 2013-09-03 10:42 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Alexey Kardashevskiy Cc: Peter Maydell, QEMU Developers, QEMU Trivial, Michael Tokarev, Gleb Natapov, Paolo Bonzini, kvm-devel On 2013-09-03 11:32, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote: > On 09/03/2013 07:29 PM, Peter Maydell wrote: >> On 3 September 2013 09:27, Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik@ozlabs.ru> wrote: >>> Signed-off-by: Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik@ozlabs.ru> >>> --- >>> >>> I need this update as VFIO on PPC64/pseries got in upstream kernel >>> and this is required by VFIO-SPAPR bits in QEMU. Others may find this >>> update useful too :) >>> --- >>> linux-headers/asm-arm64/kvm.h | 168 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >>> linux-headers/asm-arm64/kvm_para.h | 1 + >>> linux-headers/asm-mips/kvm.h | 81 +++++++++-------- >>> linux-headers/linux/kvm.h | 3 + >>> linux-headers/linux/vfio.h | 42 ++++++++- >>> linux-headers/linux/virtio_config.h | 3 + >>> 6 files changed, 254 insertions(+), 44 deletions(-) >>> create mode 100644 linux-headers/asm-arm64/kvm.h >>> create mode 100644 linux-headers/asm-arm64/kvm_para.h >> >> I think this should go in via the KVM tree, not trivial. > > I do not mind, it just went through the trivial tree last time, that's it. This shouldn't be routed through trivial in general as things broke too often in this area. Jan -- Siemens AG, Corporate Technology, CT RTC ITP SES-DE Corporate Competence Center Embedded Linux ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] linux-headers: update to 3.11 2013-09-03 10:42 ` Jan Kiszka @ 2013-09-03 15:28 ` Alexey Kardashevskiy 2013-09-03 15:34 ` Peter Maydell 2013-09-03 15:35 ` Paolo Bonzini 0 siblings, 2 replies; 15+ messages in thread From: Alexey Kardashevskiy @ 2013-09-03 15:28 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Jan Kiszka Cc: Peter Maydell, QEMU Developers, QEMU Trivial, Michael Tokarev, Gleb Natapov, Paolo Bonzini, kvm-devel On 09/03/2013 08:42 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote: > On 2013-09-03 11:32, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote: >> On 09/03/2013 07:29 PM, Peter Maydell wrote: >>> On 3 September 2013 09:27, Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik@ozlabs.ru> wrote: >>>> Signed-off-by: Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik@ozlabs.ru> >>>> --- >>>> >>>> I need this update as VFIO on PPC64/pseries got in upstream kernel >>>> and this is required by VFIO-SPAPR bits in QEMU. Others may find this >>>> update useful too :) >>>> --- >>>> linux-headers/asm-arm64/kvm.h | 168 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >>>> linux-headers/asm-arm64/kvm_para.h | 1 + >>>> linux-headers/asm-mips/kvm.h | 81 +++++++++-------- >>>> linux-headers/linux/kvm.h | 3 + >>>> linux-headers/linux/vfio.h | 42 ++++++++- >>>> linux-headers/linux/virtio_config.h | 3 + >>>> 6 files changed, 254 insertions(+), 44 deletions(-) >>>> create mode 100644 linux-headers/asm-arm64/kvm.h >>>> create mode 100644 linux-headers/asm-arm64/kvm_para.h >>> >>> I think this should go in via the KVM tree, not trivial. >> >> I do not mind, it just went through the trivial tree last time, that's it. > > This shouldn't be routed through trivial in general as things broke too > often in this area. Sorry for my ignorance, but this is The Kernel, it is already there, broken or not, even if it is broken, qemu cannot stay isolated, no? This is a mechanical change, no more. -- Alexey ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] linux-headers: update to 3.11 2013-09-03 15:28 ` Alexey Kardashevskiy @ 2013-09-03 15:34 ` Peter Maydell 2013-09-03 15:47 ` Alexey Kardashevskiy 2013-09-03 15:35 ` Paolo Bonzini 1 sibling, 1 reply; 15+ messages in thread From: Peter Maydell @ 2013-09-03 15:34 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Alexey Kardashevskiy Cc: Jan Kiszka, QEMU Developers, QEMU Trivial, Michael Tokarev, Gleb Natapov, Paolo Bonzini, kvm-devel On 3 September 2013 16:28, Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik@ozlabs.ru> wrote: > On 09/03/2013 08:42 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote: >> This shouldn't be routed through trivial in general as things broke too >> often in this area. > > > Sorry for my ignorance, but this is The Kernel, it is already there, broken > or not, even if it is broken, qemu cannot stay isolated, no? > This is a mechanical change, no more. The classic way for things to break is that a header update accidentally reverts something (because a previous update was from kvm-next and this one is from mainline, for example). Accidental updates against a kernel which is neither kvm-next nor mainline are the other common "broken" version of a header update patch. -- PMM ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] linux-headers: update to 3.11 2013-09-03 15:34 ` Peter Maydell @ 2013-09-03 15:47 ` Alexey Kardashevskiy 2013-09-03 15:55 ` Peter Maydell 2013-09-03 15:58 ` Alex Williamson 0 siblings, 2 replies; 15+ messages in thread From: Alexey Kardashevskiy @ 2013-09-03 15:47 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Peter Maydell Cc: Jan Kiszka, QEMU Developers, QEMU Trivial, Michael Tokarev, Gleb Natapov, Paolo Bonzini, kvm-devel On 09/04/2013 01:34 AM, Peter Maydell wrote: > On 3 September 2013 16:28, Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik@ozlabs.ru> wrote: >> On 09/03/2013 08:42 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote: >>> This shouldn't be routed through trivial in general as things broke too >>> often in this area. >> >> >> Sorry for my ignorance, but this is The Kernel, it is already there, broken >> or not, even if it is broken, qemu cannot stay isolated, no? >> This is a mechanical change, no more. > > The classic way for things to break is that a header > update accidentally reverts something (because a > previous update was from kvm-next and this one is > from mainline, for example). Accidental updates against > a kernel which is neither kvm-next nor mainline are > the other common "broken" version of a header update > patch. I can understand that but this update is a mainline kernel update and it is not an accidental one but very specific :-/ -- Alexey ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] linux-headers: update to 3.11 2013-09-03 15:47 ` Alexey Kardashevskiy @ 2013-09-03 15:55 ` Peter Maydell 2013-09-03 15:58 ` Alex Williamson 1 sibling, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread From: Peter Maydell @ 2013-09-03 15:55 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Alexey Kardashevskiy Cc: Jan Kiszka, QEMU Developers, QEMU Trivial, Michael Tokarev, Gleb Natapov, Paolo Bonzini, kvm-devel On 3 September 2013 16:47, Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik@ozlabs.ru> wrote: > On 09/04/2013 01:34 AM, Peter Maydell wrote: >> The classic way for things to break is that a header >> update accidentally reverts something (because a >> previous update was from kvm-next and this one is >> from mainline, for example). Accidental updates against >> a kernel which is neither kvm-next nor mainline are >> the other common "broken" version of a header update >> patch. > > I can understand that but this update is a mainline kernel > update and it is not an accidental one but very specific :-/ Nobody has been saying there is a problem with this patch. We're just saying it should go via the kvm tree rather than the trivial patches tree. -- PMM ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] linux-headers: update to 3.11 2013-09-03 15:47 ` Alexey Kardashevskiy 2013-09-03 15:55 ` Peter Maydell @ 2013-09-03 15:58 ` Alex Williamson 2013-09-03 16:03 ` Peter Maydell 1 sibling, 1 reply; 15+ messages in thread From: Alex Williamson @ 2013-09-03 15:58 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Alexey Kardashevskiy Cc: Peter Maydell, Jan Kiszka, QEMU Developers, QEMU Trivial, Michael Tokarev, Gleb Natapov, Paolo Bonzini, kvm-devel On Wed, 2013-09-04 at 01:47 +1000, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote: > On 09/04/2013 01:34 AM, Peter Maydell wrote: > > On 3 September 2013 16:28, Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik@ozlabs.ru> wrote: > >> On 09/03/2013 08:42 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote: > >>> This shouldn't be routed through trivial in general as things broke too > >>> often in this area. > >> > >> > >> Sorry for my ignorance, but this is The Kernel, it is already there, broken > >> or not, even if it is broken, qemu cannot stay isolated, no? > >> This is a mechanical change, no more. > > > > The classic way for things to break is that a header > > update accidentally reverts something (because a > > previous update was from kvm-next and this one is > > from mainline, for example). Accidental updates against > > a kernel which is neither kvm-next nor mainline are > > the other common "broken" version of a header update > > patch. > > I can understand that but this update is a mainline kernel update and it is > not an accidental one but very specific :-/ I was under the impression that we were only ever updating linux-headers from mainline, never from kvm-next. Therefore any mainline tag should be a reasonable re-base target. Thanks, Alex ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] linux-headers: update to 3.11 2013-09-03 15:58 ` Alex Williamson @ 2013-09-03 16:03 ` Peter Maydell 2013-09-03 16:12 ` Alex Williamson 0 siblings, 1 reply; 15+ messages in thread From: Peter Maydell @ 2013-09-03 16:03 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Alex Williamson Cc: Alexey Kardashevskiy, Jan Kiszka, QEMU Developers, QEMU Trivial, Michael Tokarev, Gleb Natapov, Paolo Bonzini, kvm-devel On 3 September 2013 16:58, Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com> wrote: > I was under the impression that we were only ever updating linux-headers > from mainline, never from kvm-next. Looking at the git history, it's variable. Four of the last 10 updates were from somewhere other than mainline. In any case this is the kind of policy decision that means updates should go via the QEMU KVM maintainers :-) -- PMM ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] linux-headers: update to 3.11 2013-09-03 16:03 ` Peter Maydell @ 2013-09-03 16:12 ` Alex Williamson 0 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread From: Alex Williamson @ 2013-09-03 16:12 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Peter Maydell Cc: Alexey Kardashevskiy, Jan Kiszka, QEMU Developers, QEMU Trivial, Michael Tokarev, Gleb Natapov, Paolo Bonzini, kvm-devel On Tue, 2013-09-03 at 17:03 +0100, Peter Maydell wrote: > On 3 September 2013 16:58, Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com> wrote: > > I was under the impression that we were only ever updating linux-headers > > from mainline, never from kvm-next. > > Looking at the git history, it's variable. Four of the > last 10 updates were from somewhere other than mainline. > In any case this is the kind of policy decision that > means updates should go via the QEMU KVM maintainers :-) Seems like every update except ppc has come from mainline. Personally, I don't think it makes sense anymore. QEMU has scope beyond KVM and it makes about as much sense to snapshot kvm.git as it does to snapshot my vfio next branch or Michael's virtio queue. If we only pull from mainline we never have to worry about regressing something that isn't actually upstream yet. Thanks, Alex ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] linux-headers: update to 3.11 2013-09-03 15:28 ` Alexey Kardashevskiy 2013-09-03 15:34 ` Peter Maydell @ 2013-09-03 15:35 ` Paolo Bonzini 2013-09-05 3:16 ` Alexey Kardashevskiy 1 sibling, 1 reply; 15+ messages in thread From: Paolo Bonzini @ 2013-09-03 15:35 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Alexey Kardashevskiy Cc: Jan Kiszka, Peter Maydell, QEMU Developers, QEMU Trivial, Michael Tokarev, Gleb Natapov, kvm-devel Il 03/09/2013 17:28, Alexey Kardashevskiy ha scritto: > On 09/03/2013 08:42 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote: >> On 2013-09-03 11:32, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote: >>> On 09/03/2013 07:29 PM, Peter Maydell wrote: >>>> On 3 September 2013 09:27, Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik@ozlabs.ru> wrote: >>>>> Signed-off-by: Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik@ozlabs.ru> >>>>> --- >>>>> >>>>> I need this update as VFIO on PPC64/pseries got in upstream kernel >>>>> and this is required by VFIO-SPAPR bits in QEMU. Others may find this >>>>> update useful too :) >>>>> --- >>>>> linux-headers/asm-arm64/kvm.h | 168 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >>>>> linux-headers/asm-arm64/kvm_para.h | 1 + >>>>> linux-headers/asm-mips/kvm.h | 81 +++++++++-------- >>>>> linux-headers/linux/kvm.h | 3 + >>>>> linux-headers/linux/vfio.h | 42 ++++++++- >>>>> linux-headers/linux/virtio_config.h | 3 + >>>>> 6 files changed, 254 insertions(+), 44 deletions(-) >>>>> create mode 100644 linux-headers/asm-arm64/kvm.h >>>>> create mode 100644 linux-headers/asm-arm64/kvm_para.h >>>> >>>> I think this should go in via the KVM tree, not trivial. >>> >>> I do not mind, it just went through the trivial tree last time, that's it. >> >> This shouldn't be routed through trivial in general as things broke too >> often in this area. > > Sorry for my ignorance, but this is The Kernel, it is already there, broken > or not, even if it is broken, qemu cannot stay isolated, no? > This is a mechanical change, no more. It's a matter of keeping things bisectable. If we can detect a breakage, we can first work around it, and then apply the header update. And if we don't detect it, maintainers usually send pull requests when they have time to work on breakage caused by their patches. Paolo ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] linux-headers: update to 3.11 2013-09-03 15:35 ` Paolo Bonzini @ 2013-09-05 3:16 ` Alexey Kardashevskiy 2013-09-05 6:07 ` Paolo Bonzini 0 siblings, 1 reply; 15+ messages in thread From: Alexey Kardashevskiy @ 2013-09-05 3:16 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Paolo Bonzini Cc: Jan Kiszka, Peter Maydell, QEMU Developers, QEMU Trivial, Michael Tokarev, Gleb Natapov, kvm-devel On 09/04/2013 01:35 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > Il 03/09/2013 17:28, Alexey Kardashevskiy ha scritto: >> On 09/03/2013 08:42 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote: >>> On 2013-09-03 11:32, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote: >>>> On 09/03/2013 07:29 PM, Peter Maydell wrote: >>>>> On 3 September 2013 09:27, Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik@ozlabs.ru> wrote: >>>>>> Signed-off-by: Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik@ozlabs.ru> >>>>>> --- >>>>>> >>>>>> I need this update as VFIO on PPC64/pseries got in upstream kernel >>>>>> and this is required by VFIO-SPAPR bits in QEMU. Others may find this >>>>>> update useful too :) >>>>>> --- >>>>>> linux-headers/asm-arm64/kvm.h | 168 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >>>>>> linux-headers/asm-arm64/kvm_para.h | 1 + >>>>>> linux-headers/asm-mips/kvm.h | 81 +++++++++-------- >>>>>> linux-headers/linux/kvm.h | 3 + >>>>>> linux-headers/linux/vfio.h | 42 ++++++++- >>>>>> linux-headers/linux/virtio_config.h | 3 + >>>>>> 6 files changed, 254 insertions(+), 44 deletions(-) >>>>>> create mode 100644 linux-headers/asm-arm64/kvm.h >>>>>> create mode 100644 linux-headers/asm-arm64/kvm_para.h >>>>> >>>>> I think this should go in via the KVM tree, not trivial. >>>> >>>> I do not mind, it just went through the trivial tree last time, that's it. >>> >>> This shouldn't be routed through trivial in general as things broke too >>> often in this area. >> >> Sorry for my ignorance, but this is The Kernel, it is already there, broken >> or not, even if it is broken, qemu cannot stay isolated, no? >> This is a mechanical change, no more. > > It's a matter of keeping things bisectable. If we can detect a > breakage, we can first work around it, and then apply the header update. > And if we don't detect it, maintainers usually send pull requests when > they have time to work on breakage caused by their patches. I can see the discussion but I do not see if anyone is going to pull this through any tree. Please, somebody, pull. Thanks. -- Alexey ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] linux-headers: update to 3.11 2013-09-05 3:16 ` Alexey Kardashevskiy @ 2013-09-05 6:07 ` Paolo Bonzini 2013-09-18 3:04 ` Alexey Kardashevskiy 0 siblings, 1 reply; 15+ messages in thread From: Paolo Bonzini @ 2013-09-05 6:07 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Alexey Kardashevskiy Cc: Jan Kiszka, Peter Maydell, QEMU Developers, QEMU Trivial, Michael Tokarev, Gleb Natapov, kvm-devel Il 05/09/2013 05:16, Alexey Kardashevskiy ha scritto: >>> >> Sorry for my ignorance, but this is The Kernel, it is already there, broken >>> >> or not, even if it is broken, qemu cannot stay isolated, no? >>> >> This is a mechanical change, no more. >> > >> > It's a matter of keeping things bisectable. If we can detect a >> > breakage, we can first work around it, and then apply the header update. >> > And if we don't detect it, maintainers usually send pull requests when >> > they have time to work on breakage caused by their patches. > > I can see the discussion but I do not see if anyone is going to pull this > through any tree. Please, somebody, pull. Thanks. It will go in through the KVM tree, probably sometime next week. Paolo ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] linux-headers: update to 3.11 2013-09-05 6:07 ` Paolo Bonzini @ 2013-09-18 3:04 ` Alexey Kardashevskiy 2013-09-18 4:51 ` Gleb Natapov 0 siblings, 1 reply; 15+ messages in thread From: Alexey Kardashevskiy @ 2013-09-18 3:04 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Paolo Bonzini Cc: Jan Kiszka, Peter Maydell, QEMU Developers, QEMU Trivial, Michael Tokarev, Gleb Natapov, kvm-devel, Benjamin Herrenschmidt On 09/05/2013 04:07 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > Il 05/09/2013 05:16, Alexey Kardashevskiy ha scritto: >>>>>> Sorry for my ignorance, but this is The Kernel, it is already there, broken >>>>>> or not, even if it is broken, qemu cannot stay isolated, no? >>>>>> This is a mechanical change, no more. >>>> >>>> It's a matter of keeping things bisectable. If we can detect a >>>> breakage, we can first work around it, and then apply the header update. >>>> And if we don't detect it, maintainers usually send pull requests when >>>> they have time to work on breakage caused by their patches. >> >> I can see the discussion but I do not see if anyone is going to pull this >> through any tree. Please, somebody, pull. Thanks. > > It will go in through the KVM tree, probably sometime next week. It is pretty impressive how such a trivial patch is still on its way to the upstream :) -- Alexey ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] linux-headers: update to 3.11 2013-09-18 3:04 ` Alexey Kardashevskiy @ 2013-09-18 4:51 ` Gleb Natapov 0 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread From: Gleb Natapov @ 2013-09-18 4:51 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Alexey Kardashevskiy Cc: Peter Maydell, kvm-devel, QEMU Trivial, Jan Kiszka, Michael Tokarev, QEMU Developers, Paolo Bonzini On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 01:04:01PM +1000, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote: > On 09/05/2013 04:07 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > > Il 05/09/2013 05:16, Alexey Kardashevskiy ha scritto: > >>>>>> Sorry for my ignorance, but this is The Kernel, it is already there, broken > >>>>>> or not, even if it is broken, qemu cannot stay isolated, no? > >>>>>> This is a mechanical change, no more. > >>>> > >>>> It's a matter of keeping things bisectable. If we can detect a > >>>> breakage, we can first work around it, and then apply the header update. > >>>> And if we don't detect it, maintainers usually send pull requests when > >>>> they have time to work on breakage caused by their patches. > >> > >> I can see the discussion but I do not see if anyone is going to pull this > >> through any tree. Please, somebody, pull. Thanks. > > > > It will go in through the KVM tree, probably sometime next week. > > > It is pretty impressive how such a trivial patch is still on its way to the > upstream :) > It was applied long time ago https://git.kernel.org/cgit/virt/kvm/qemu-kvm.git/commit/?h=uq/master&id=8c409e659bc1373fab49a277bb5dc71babb73551 Sync with qemu.git does not happen after every patch though. If you are working on kvm parts using qemu-kvm.git uq/master branch will make sure that you are working on most up to date kvm bits. If you work depends on something that is not in qemu-kvm.git then let kvm maintainers know and we will send pull request to Anthony earlier. -- Gleb. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2013-09-18 4:51 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <1378196857-27541-1-git-send-email-aik@ozlabs.ru>
2013-09-03 9:29 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] linux-headers: update to 3.11 Peter Maydell
2013-09-03 9:32 ` Alexey Kardashevskiy
2013-09-03 10:42 ` Jan Kiszka
2013-09-03 15:28 ` Alexey Kardashevskiy
2013-09-03 15:34 ` Peter Maydell
2013-09-03 15:47 ` Alexey Kardashevskiy
2013-09-03 15:55 ` Peter Maydell
2013-09-03 15:58 ` Alex Williamson
2013-09-03 16:03 ` Peter Maydell
2013-09-03 16:12 ` Alex Williamson
2013-09-03 15:35 ` Paolo Bonzini
2013-09-05 3:16 ` Alexey Kardashevskiy
2013-09-05 6:07 ` Paolo Bonzini
2013-09-18 3:04 ` Alexey Kardashevskiy
2013-09-18 4:51 ` Gleb Natapov
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).