From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Paolo Bonzini Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] linux-headers: update to 3.11 Date: Thu, 05 Sep 2013 08:07:15 +0200 Message-ID: <52281F93.4070805@redhat.com> References: <1378196857-27541-1-git-send-email-aik@ozlabs.ru> <5225AC9A.2090601@ozlabs.ru> <5225BD32.8030001@siemens.com> <52260025.3050704@ozlabs.ru> <522601AB.1050901@redhat.com> <5227F79B.8090804@ozlabs.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=KOI8-R Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Jan Kiszka , Peter Maydell , QEMU Developers , QEMU Trivial , Michael Tokarev , Gleb Natapov , kvm-devel To: Alexey Kardashevskiy Return-path: Received: from mail-ee0-f43.google.com ([74.125.83.43]:56529 "EHLO mail-ee0-f43.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754546Ab3IEGHQ (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Sep 2013 02:07:16 -0400 Received: by mail-ee0-f43.google.com with SMTP id e52so641060eek.2 for ; Wed, 04 Sep 2013 23:07:15 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <5227F79B.8090804@ozlabs.ru> Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Il 05/09/2013 05:16, Alexey Kardashevskiy ha scritto: >>> >> Sorry for my ignorance, but this is The Kernel, it is already there, broken >>> >> or not, even if it is broken, qemu cannot stay isolated, no? >>> >> This is a mechanical change, no more. >> > >> > It's a matter of keeping things bisectable. If we can detect a >> > breakage, we can first work around it, and then apply the header update. >> > And if we don't detect it, maintainers usually send pull requests when >> > they have time to work on breakage caused by their patches. > > I can see the discussion but I do not see if anyone is going to pull this > through any tree. Please, somebody, pull. Thanks. It will go in through the KVM tree, probably sometime next week. Paolo