From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: qemu, numa: non-contiguous cpusets
Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2013 14:18:05 +0200
Message-ID: <52496BFD.4030809@redhat.com>
References: <20130929151044.GB5426@pd.tnic> <52493EC6.4020403@redhat.com> <20130930094936.GA16383@pd.tnic>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com>,
	Andre Przywara <andre@andrep.de>,
	Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>, X86 ML <x86@kernel.org>,
	KVM <kvm@vger.kernel.org>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org,
	libvir-list@redhat.com, Jiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com>,
	Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Return-path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <20130930094936.GA16383@pd.tnic>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: kvm.vger.kernel.org

Il 30/09/2013 11:49, Borislav Petkov ha scritto:
> Yeah: https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2013-09/msg02833.html
> 
> Although I don't see from it how the syntax for -cpus will look like
> from that QAPI magic except that it is an
> 
> +   '*cpus':   ['uint16'],

It's "-numa node,cpus=0-1,cpus=4-5".

Paolo