From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Paolo Bonzini Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 00/11 Allow PR and HV KVM to coexist in one kernel Date: Tue, 01 Oct 2013 13:41:48 +0200 Message-ID: <524AB4FC.10705@redhat.com> References: <1380276233-17095-1-git-send-email-aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <878uyibkq2.fsf@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <48337EF0-471D-4BDB-8088-FC072FF82753@suse.de> <87had2bgme.fsf@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <524990A9.60704@suse.de> <87ob79cjvm.fsf@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <524AB3AE.5000503@suse.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" , Benjamin Herrenschmidt , Paul Mackerras , linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org, " list" , Gleb Natapov , =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Andreas_F=E4rber?= To: Alexander Graf Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:58453 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751095Ab3JALll (ORCPT ); Tue, 1 Oct 2013 07:41:41 -0400 In-Reply-To: <524AB3AE.5000503@suse.de> Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Il 01/10/2013 13:36, Alexander Graf ha scritto: >>>> >>> Yes, so we should verify in the machine models that we're runnable with >>> the currently selected type at least, to give the user a sensible error >>> message. >> Something like the below > > I like that one a lot. Andreas, Paolo, what do you think? Yes, it's fine. Paolo