From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [patch 2/3] pvclock: detect watchdog reset at pvclock read
Date: Tue, 08 Oct 2013 11:58:10 +0200
Message-ID: <5253D732.8060906@redhat.com>
References: <20131008010515.516032211@amt.cnet> <20131008010552.779616517@amt.cnet>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, dzickus@redhat.com, gleb@redhat.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
To: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
Return-path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <20131008010552.779616517@amt.cnet>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: kvm.vger.kernel.org

Il 08/10/2013 03:05, Marcelo Tosatti ha scritto:
> +void pvclock_touch_watchdogs(void)
> +{
> +	touch_softlockup_watchdog_sync();
> +	clocksource_touch_watchdog();
> +	rcu_cpu_stall_reset();
> +	reset_hung_task_detector();
> +}
> +

Should this function be in kernel/ instead?  It's not really
pvclock-specific.

Paolo