From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] arm/arm64: KVM: MMIO support for BE guest
Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2013 19:05:00 +0100
Message-ID: <52811C4C.3060708@redhat.com>
References: <1383905236-32741-1-git-send-email-marc.zyngier@arm.com> <1383905236-32741-3-git-send-email-marc.zyngier@arm.com> <5280B9CC.6020502@redhat.com> <CAMJs5B8S+m8bJfokBycMWXUcXSPT-S25_nq241=Ots7kzkjN7Q@mail.gmail.com> <5280F36B.5040501@redhat.com> <CAMJs5B_9m-GTNNHr2z2iVkcDO=kSOr8S9Wi9_iNf7bNEDNgTEQ@mail.gmail.com> <52811A3C.2050101@redhat.com> <CAFEAcA_8EPBscwnqudXU+qj3Z2Tbm=_Q9zeo=AwnkdVH6iRtSw@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org>,
	"kvm@vger.kernel.org" <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
	"kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu" <kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu>
To: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Return-path: <kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:31872 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1754705Ab3KKSFN (ORCPT <rfc822;kvm@vger.kernel.org>);
	Mon, 11 Nov 2013 13:05:13 -0500
In-Reply-To: <CAFEAcA_8EPBscwnqudXU+qj3Z2Tbm=_Q9zeo=AwnkdVH6iRtSw@mail.gmail.com>
Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <kvm.vger.kernel.org>

Il 11/11/2013 19:03, Peter Maydell ha scritto:
>> How does this patch affect guest
>> ABI, and is guest ABI not yet considered stable for KVM ARM?
>
> QEMU currently insists on 4 CPUs max for A15, so the
> question doesn't come up in that case.

Still, does the guest ABI not matter only for kvmtool, or also for QEMU?

Paolo