From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Paolo Bonzini Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] X86: Intel MPX definiation Date: Fri, 06 Dec 2013 09:22:12 +0100 Message-ID: <52A18934.9060305@redhat.com> References: <52A0A4F7.2020508@redhat.com> <52A10565.8070205@zytor.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "Liu, Jinsong" , Gleb Natapov , "qemu-devel@nongnu.org" , kvm , Xudong Hao , Ingo Molnar , Thomas Gleixner , "Ren, Qiaowei" To: "H. Peter Anvin" Return-path: Received: from mail-ea0-f172.google.com ([209.85.215.172]:60149 "EHLO mail-ea0-f172.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751619Ab3LFIWT (ORCPT ); Fri, 6 Dec 2013 03:22:19 -0500 Received: by mail-ea0-f172.google.com with SMTP id q10so135360ead.17 for ; Fri, 06 Dec 2013 00:22:18 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <52A10565.8070205@zytor.com> Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Il 05/12/2013 23:59, H. Peter Anvin ha scritto: > Hi, I'm currently reviewing internally another set of patches for MPX > support which would at least in part conflict with these. I don't see > the rest of the series -- where was it posted? It was posted to kvm-devel and not threaded. :( Paolo