From: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@web.de>
To: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
Cc: kvm-devel <kvm@vger.kernel.org>, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: KVM: VMX: fix use after free of vmx->loaded_vmcs
Date: Fri, 03 Jan 2014 20:54:33 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <52C71579.6040502@web.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140103193628.GA17605@amt.cnet>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2059 bytes --]
On 2014-01-03 20:36, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 03, 2014 at 08:27:07PM +0100, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>> On 2014-01-03 20:00, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
>>>
>>> After free_loaded_vmcs executes, the "loaded_vmcs" structure
>>> is kfreed, and now vmx->loaded_vmcs points to a kfreed area.
>>> Subsequent free_loaded_vmcs then attempts to manipulate
>>> vmx->loaded_vmcs.
>>
>> Cannot follow yet. How precisely do we call free_loaded_vmcs twice on
>> the same loaded_vmcs?
>
> You don't:
>
> nested_free_all_saved_vmcss calls kfree(item). item is struct
> vmcs02_list *, which is:
>
> /* Used to remember the last vmcs02 used for some recently used vmcs12s
> * */
> struct vmcs02_list {
> struct list_head list;
> gpa_t vmptr;
> struct loaded_vmcs vmcs02;
> };
>
> And vmx->loaded_vmcs = &item->vmcs02.
Yeah, now I see. You may add my
Reviewed-by: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>
>
>> I thought the frees triggered by free_nested ->
>> nested_free_all_saved_vmcss stay away from vmx->loaded_vmcs, no?
>
> Stays away as far as free_loaded_vmcs, yes.
> Except it frees the structure pointed to by vmx->loaded_vmcs.
>
>
>
> The separate question is about when is vmcs01 ever allocated again
> if freed by nested_free_all_saved_vmcss (the other email).
>
>> Jan
>>
>>>
>>> Switch the order to avoid the problem.
>>>
>>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1047892
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
>>>
>>> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
>>> index da7837e..2efa33f0 100644
>>> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
>>> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
>>> @@ -7332,8 +7332,8 @@ static void vmx_free_vcpu(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>>> struct vcpu_vmx *vmx = to_vmx(vcpu);
>>>
>>> free_vpid(vmx);
>>> - free_nested(vmx);
>>> free_loaded_vmcs(vmx->loaded_vmcs);
>>> + free_nested(vmx);
>>> kfree(vmx->guest_msrs);
>>> kvm_vcpu_uninit(vcpu);
>>> kmem_cache_free(kvm_vcpu_cache, vmx);
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 263 bytes --]
prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-01-03 19:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-01-03 19:00 KVM: VMX: fix use after free of vmx->loaded_vmcs Marcelo Tosatti
2014-01-03 19:27 ` Jan Kiszka
2014-01-03 19:36 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2014-01-03 19:54 ` Jan Kiszka [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=52C71579.6040502@web.de \
--to=jan.kiszka@web.de \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox