From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
Cc: kvm-devel <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org>,
Glauber Costa <glommer@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: KVM: x86: fix tsc catchup issue with tsc scaling
Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2014 17:53:22 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <52D6BD02.5050807@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140115163758.GA7161@amt.cnet>
Il 15/01/2014 17:37, Marcelo Tosatti ha scritto:
> > Right. Another question, what about this comment:
> >
> > /* Reset of TSC must disable overshoot protection below */
> > vcpu->arch.hv_clock.tsc_timestamp = 0;
> > vcpu->arch.last_guest_tsc = data;
> >
> > Should it be instead like this:
> >
> > vcpu->arch.hv_clock.tsc_timestamp += data - vcpu->arch.last_guest_tsc;
> > vcpu->arch.last_guest_tsc = data;
> >
> > ?
>
> Don't see why it should?
Setting tsc_timestamp to 0 makes no sense with the current code, I'm
trying to understand if the right fix is to delete that line or
something else. What I proposed (plus a version increase) would make a
pvclock read continuous before and after the change.
But looking more at the surrounding code, the calls to kvm_write_tsc
ultimately result in a master clock update as soon as all TSCs agree and
the master clock is re-enabled. This master clock update rewrites
tsc_timestamp. Then I think that the line that sets tsc_timestamp to 0
can be deleted.
Paolo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-01-15 16:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-01-06 14:18 KVM: x86: fix tsc catchup issue with tsc scaling Marcelo Tosatti
2014-01-15 11:43 ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-01-15 12:25 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2014-01-15 12:34 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2014-01-15 12:55 ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-01-15 16:37 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2014-01-15 16:53 ` Paolo Bonzini [this message]
2014-01-15 16:55 ` Marcelo Tosatti
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=52D6BD02.5050807@redhat.com \
--to=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=glommer@gmail.com \
--cc=jeremy@goop.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox