From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Paolo Bonzini Subject: Re: [PATCHv2/RFC] kvm/irqchip: Speed up KVM_SET_GSI_ROUTING Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2014 10:19:25 +0100 Message-ID: <52D8F59D.90803@redhat.com> References: <52D7C186.1070700@redhat.com> <1389876260-46636-1-git-send-email-borntraeger@de.ibm.com> <52D7D7A2.2080409@redhat.com> <52D7D95F.5040600@de.ibm.com> <52D7D987.8060305@redhat.com> <20140116185638.GD29522@redhat.com> <52D8E9E6.5040507@de.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "Michael S. Tsirkin" , Gleb Natapov , KVM , linux-s390 , Cornelia Huck , Jens Freimann , agraf@suse.de To: Christian Borntraeger Return-path: Received: from mail-qc0-f172.google.com ([209.85.216.172]:65448 "EHLO mail-qc0-f172.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752233AbaAQJTb (ORCPT ); Fri, 17 Jan 2014 04:19:31 -0500 In-Reply-To: <52D8E9E6.5040507@de.ibm.com> Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Il 17/01/2014 09:29, Christian Borntraeger ha scritto: > Michael, > do you have a quick way to check if srcu has a noticeable impact on int > injection on your systems? I am happy with either v2 or v3 of the patch, > but srcu_synchronize_expedited seems to have less latency impact on the > full system than rcu_synchronize_expedited. This might give Paolo a hint > which of the patches is the right way to go. For 3.14, I'll definitely pick v3. Paolo