kvm.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
To: Anup Patel <anup@brainfault.org>
Cc: "kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu" <kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu>,
	linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	KVM General <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
	Catalin Marinas <Catalin.Marinas@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 2/3] arm64: KVM: trap VM system registers until MMU and caches are ON
Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2014 13:41:58 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <52DD27A6.5010706@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAAhSdy1iwc2ZBoPO9KXJzzaEQz-SWpYXkkRvjyRjQPdPe31chQ@mail.gmail.com>

Hi Anup,

On 20/01/14 12:00, Anup Patel wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 8:33 PM, Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> wrote:
>> In order to be able to detect the point where the guest enables
>> its MMU and caches, trap all the VM related system registers.
>>
>> Once we see the guest enabling both the MMU and the caches, we
>> can go back to a saner mode of operation, which is to leave these
>> registers in complete control of the guest.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
>> ---
>>  arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_arm.h |  3 ++-
>>  arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c        | 58 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
>>  2 files changed, 49 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_arm.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_arm.h
>> index c98ef47..fd0a651 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_arm.h
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_arm.h
>> @@ -62,6 +62,7 @@
>>   * RW:         64bit by default, can be overriden for 32bit VMs
>>   * TAC:                Trap ACTLR
>>   * TSC:                Trap SMC
>> + * TVM:                Trap VM ops (until M+C set in SCTLR_EL1)
>>   * TSW:                Trap cache operations by set/way
>>   * TWE:                Trap WFE
>>   * TWI:                Trap WFI
>> @@ -74,7 +75,7 @@
>>   * SWIO:       Turn set/way invalidates into set/way clean+invalidate
>>   */
>>  #define HCR_GUEST_FLAGS (HCR_TSC | HCR_TSW | HCR_TWE | HCR_TWI | HCR_VM | \
>> -                        HCR_BSU_IS | HCR_FB | HCR_TAC | \
>> +                        HCR_TVM | HCR_BSU_IS | HCR_FB | HCR_TAC | \
>>                          HCR_AMO | HCR_IMO | HCR_FMO | \
>>                          HCR_SWIO | HCR_TIDCP | HCR_RW)
>>  #define HCR_VIRT_EXCP_MASK (HCR_VA | HCR_VI | HCR_VF)
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
>> index 02e9d09..5e92b9e 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
>> @@ -121,6 +121,42 @@ done:
>>  }
>>
>>  /*
>> + * Generic accessor for VM registers. Only called as long as HCR_TVM
>> + * is set.
>> + */
>> +static bool access_vm_reg(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
>> +                         const struct sys_reg_params *p,
>> +                         const struct sys_reg_desc *r)
>> +{
>> +       BUG_ON(!p->is_write);
>> +
>> +       vcpu_sys_reg(vcpu, r->reg) = *vcpu_reg(vcpu, p->Rt);
>> +       return true;
>> +}
>> +
>> +/*
>> + * SCTLR_EL1 accessor. Only called as long as HCR_TVM is set.  If the
>> + * guest enables the MMU, we stop trapping the VM sys_regs and leave
>> + * it in complete control of the caches.
>> + */
>> +static bool access_sctlr_el1(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
>> +                            const struct sys_reg_params *p,
>> +                            const struct sys_reg_desc *r)
>> +{
>> +       unsigned long val;
>> +
>> +       BUG_ON(!p->is_write);
>> +
>> +       val = *vcpu_reg(vcpu, p->Rt);
>> +       vcpu_sys_reg(vcpu, r->reg) = val;
>> +
>> +       if ((val & (0b101)) == 0b101)   /* MMU+Caches enabled? */
>> +               vcpu->arch.hcr_el2 &= ~HCR_TVM;
>> +
>> +       return true;
>> +}
>> +
>> +/*
>>   * We could trap ID_DFR0 and tell the guest we don't support performance
>>   * monitoring.  Unfortunately the patch to make the kernel check ID_DFR0 was
>>   * NAKed, so it will read the PMCR anyway.
>> @@ -185,32 +221,32 @@ static const struct sys_reg_desc sys_reg_descs[] = {
>>           NULL, reset_mpidr, MPIDR_EL1 },
>>         /* SCTLR_EL1 */
>>         { Op0(0b11), Op1(0b000), CRn(0b0001), CRm(0b0000), Op2(0b000),
>> -         NULL, reset_val, SCTLR_EL1, 0x00C50078 },
>> +         access_sctlr_el1, reset_val, SCTLR_EL1, 0x00C50078 },
> 
> This patch in its current form breaks Aarch32 VMs on Foundation v8 Model
> because encoding for Aarch64 VM registers we get Op0=0b11 and for Aarch32
> VM registers we get Op0=0b00 when trapped.
> 
> Either its a Foundation v8 Model bug or we need to add more enteries in
> sys_reg_desc[] for Aarch32 VM registers with Op0=0b00.

That's a good point. But Op0 isn't defined for AArch32, the value is
simply hardcoded in kvm_handle_cp15_32/kvm_handle_cp15_64, which is
obviously horribly broken.

I'll work on a fix for that, thanks noticing it.

Does this series otherwise fix your L3 cache issue (assuming you stick
to 64bit guests)?

Cheers,

	M.
-- 
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...

  reply	other threads:[~2014-01-20 13:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-01-17 15:03 [RFC PATCH 0/3] arm64: KVM: host cache maintainance when guest caches are off Marc Zyngier
2014-01-17 15:03 ` [RFC PATCH 1/3] arm64: KVM: force cache clean on page fault when " Marc Zyngier
2014-01-17 15:03 ` [RFC PATCH 2/3] arm64: KVM: trap VM system registers until MMU and caches are ON Marc Zyngier
2014-01-20 12:00   ` Anup Patel
2014-01-20 13:41     ` Marc Zyngier [this message]
2014-01-20 16:30       ` Anup Patel
2014-01-21 12:17         ` Pranavkumar Sawargaonkar
2014-01-21 14:15           ` Marc Zyngier
2014-01-17 15:03 ` [RFC PATCH 3/3] arm64: KVM: flush VM pages before letting the guest enable caches Marc Zyngier

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=52DD27A6.5010706@arm.com \
    --to=marc.zyngier@arm.com \
    --cc=Catalin.Marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=anup@brainfault.org \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).