From: "Andreas Färber" <afaerber@suse.de>
To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/7 RESEND] target-i386: Simplify kvm_cpu_fill_host() and kvm_check_features_against_host()
Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2014 22:07:47 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <52DD9023.2060204@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140120203923.GD14528@redhat.com>
Am 20.01.2014 21:39, schrieb Michael S. Tsirkin:
> On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 04:36:56PM -0200, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
>> On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 02:41:07PM -0200, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
>>> Resend of series submitted on 24 November 2013, that didn't get any reply. Only
>>> change is a trivial conflict on patch 7/7.
>>
>> Question: which tree is the most appropriate to get this in? qom-cpu?
>> kvm?
>
> Either kvm or my pc tree.
> Seems unrelated to qom.
Seems unrelated to PC. ;) I've been maintaining target-i386/cpu.c as
part of my QOM CPU tree according to MAINTAINERS.
I don't mind whether this goes through Paolo's or my tree, but for me to
take KVM related changes, I expect review from the KVM side.
> Paolo - want to review and take this?
Regards,
Andreas
>>> target-i386/cpu.c | 89 +++++++++++++------------------------------------------
>>> 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 69 deletions(-)
--
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imendörffer; HRB 16746 AG Nürnberg
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-01-20 21:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <1390236074-21533-1-git-send-email-ehabkost@redhat.com>
2014-01-20 18:36 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/7 RESEND] target-i386: Simplify kvm_cpu_fill_host() and kvm_check_features_against_host() Eduardo Habkost
2014-01-20 20:39 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2014-01-20 21:07 ` Andreas Färber [this message]
2014-01-20 22:51 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2014-01-21 10:03 ` [Qemu-devel] " Paolo Bonzini
2014-01-21 10:20 ` Andreas Färber
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=52DD9023.2060204@suse.de \
--to=afaerber@suse.de \
--cc=ehabkost@redhat.com \
--cc=imammedo@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).