From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/7 RESEND] target-i386: Simplify kvm_cpu_fill_host()
 and kvm_check_features_against_host()
Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2014 11:03:51 +0100
Message-ID: <52DE4607.5070206@redhat.com>
References: <1390236074-21533-1-git-send-email-ehabkost@redhat.com> <20140120183656.GF24353@otherpad.lan.raisama.net> <20140120203923.GD14528@redhat.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org,
	Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>,
	=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Andreas_F=E4rber?= <afaerber@suse.de>,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org
To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Return-path: <kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:26548 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1754265AbaAUKEs (ORCPT <rfc822;kvm@vger.kernel.org>);
	Tue, 21 Jan 2014 05:04:48 -0500
In-Reply-To: <20140120203923.GD14528@redhat.com>
Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <kvm.vger.kernel.org>

Il 20/01/2014 21:39, Michael S. Tsirkin ha scritto:
>>> > > Resend of series submitted on 24 November 2013, that didn't get any reply. Only
>>> > > change is a trivial conflict on patch 7/7.
>> > 
>> > Question: which tree is the most appropriate to get this in? qom-cpu?
>> > kvm?
> Either kvm or my pc tree.
> Seems unrelated to qom.
> Paolo - want to review and take this?
> 

Yup, will include in the next uq/master pull request.

Paolo