From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Paolo Bonzini Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] X86/KVM: enable Intel MPX for KVM Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2014 17:33:18 +0100 Message-ID: <52DEA14E.2030602@redhat.com> References: <1386394315-48984-1-git-send-email-jinsong.liu@intel.com> <52A83606.40908@redhat.com> <52A98548.9010008@redhat.com> <52DD3427.9020502@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "gleb@redhat.com" , "hpa@zytor.com" , "kvm@vger.kernel.org" , "qemu-devel@nongnu.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "Ren, Qiaowei" To: "Liu, Jinsong" Return-path: In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: kvm.vger.kernel.org Il 21/01/2014 16:25, Liu, Jinsong ha scritto: > Hmm? I remember I have sent out the rebased patches v3 last month > If you didn't receive them I'm OK to rebase and resend them. BTW, what's > the review remarks? I remember you commented that the patches are fine. > Any misunderstanding please point out to me. You sent v3 of QEMU, but not of KVM. I don't see any mail from you after December 12th on kvm@vger.kernel.org. I can see my comment that the patches were fine (apart from needing a rebase), but the threading was wrong and I cannot find anymore _which_ patches they were. I did find a comment that BNDCFGS must be added to msrs_to_save, but I don't know if that was v1 or v2 because you didn't add the version number when sending v2. Paolo