From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Paolo Bonzini Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [uq/master PATCH 0/7] x86 CPU subclasses, take 7 Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2014 16:11:58 +0100 Message-ID: <52EBBD3E.5060600@redhat.com> References: <1391111339-6958-1-git-send-email-ehabkost@redhat.com> <20140131154853.34c41154@thinkpad> <20140131151024.GX2221@otherpad.lan.raisama.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, libvir-list@redhat.com, Jiri Denemark , =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Andreas_F=E4rber?= , luiz@otherpad.lan.raisama.net To: Eduardo Habkost , Igor Mammedov Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:48630 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932567AbaAaPMH (ORCPT ); Fri, 31 Jan 2014 10:12:07 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20140131151024.GX2221@otherpad.lan.raisama.net> Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Il 31/01/2014 16:10, Eduardo Habkost ha scritto: > I don't mind which command is used, as long as we have the same effect. > I used object-add in my example because device_add rejects the CPU > classes by now (because they have cannot_instantiate_with_device_add_yet=true). > > But now I have one question: how can people know which parts of the QMP > semantics will be stable, and which parts are subject to change? object-add was added in 2.0, so it was never stable. Paolo