From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com, bp@alien8.de,
dave.hansen@linux.intel.com, x86@kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH MANUALSEL 5.10 4/6] KVM: nVMX: WARN on any attempt to allocate shadow VMCS for vmcs02
Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2022 17:35:37 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <52ec7622-efcf-dfd6-2560-3114f90f7618@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220209185714.48936-4-sashal@kernel.org>
On 2/9/22 19:57, Sasha Levin wrote:
> From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
>
> [ Upstream commit d6e656cd266cdcc95abd372c7faef05bee271d1a ]
>
> WARN if KVM attempts to allocate a shadow VMCS for vmcs02. KVM emulates
> VMCS shadowing but doesn't virtualize it, i.e. KVM should never allocate
> a "real" shadow VMCS for L2.
>
> The previous code WARNed but continued anyway with the allocation,
> presumably in an attempt to avoid NULL pointer dereference.
> However, alloc_vmcs (and hence alloc_shadow_vmcs) can fail, and
> indeed the sole caller does:
>
> if (enable_shadow_vmcs && !alloc_shadow_vmcs(vcpu))
> goto out_shadow_vmcs;
>
> which makes it not a useful attempt.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
> Message-Id: <20220125220527.2093146-1-seanjc@google.com>
> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
> ---
> arch/x86/kvm/vmx/nested.c | 22 ++++++++++++----------
> 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/nested.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/nested.c
> index 0c2389d0fdafe..0734a98eaaad1 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/nested.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/nested.c
> @@ -4786,18 +4786,20 @@ static struct vmcs *alloc_shadow_vmcs(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> struct loaded_vmcs *loaded_vmcs = vmx->loaded_vmcs;
>
> /*
> - * We should allocate a shadow vmcs for vmcs01 only when L1
> - * executes VMXON and free it when L1 executes VMXOFF.
> - * As it is invalid to execute VMXON twice, we shouldn't reach
> - * here when vmcs01 already have an allocated shadow vmcs.
> + * KVM allocates a shadow VMCS only when L1 executes VMXON and frees it
> + * when L1 executes VMXOFF or the vCPU is forced out of nested
> + * operation. VMXON faults if the CPU is already post-VMXON, so it
> + * should be impossible to already have an allocated shadow VMCS. KVM
> + * doesn't support virtualization of VMCS shadowing, so vmcs01 should
> + * always be the loaded VMCS.
> */
> - WARN_ON(loaded_vmcs == &vmx->vmcs01 && loaded_vmcs->shadow_vmcs);
> + if (WARN_ON(loaded_vmcs != &vmx->vmcs01 || loaded_vmcs->shadow_vmcs))
> + return loaded_vmcs->shadow_vmcs;
> +
> + loaded_vmcs->shadow_vmcs = alloc_vmcs(true);
> + if (loaded_vmcs->shadow_vmcs)
> + vmcs_clear(loaded_vmcs->shadow_vmcs);
>
> - if (!loaded_vmcs->shadow_vmcs) {
> - loaded_vmcs->shadow_vmcs = alloc_vmcs(true);
> - if (loaded_vmcs->shadow_vmcs)
> - vmcs_clear(loaded_vmcs->shadow_vmcs);
> - }
> return loaded_vmcs->shadow_vmcs;
> }
>
NACK
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-02-10 16:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-02-09 18:57 [PATCH MANUALSEL 5.10 1/6] KVM: eventfd: Fix false positive RCU usage warning Sasha Levin
2022-02-09 18:57 ` [PATCH MANUALSEL 5.10 2/6] KVM: nVMX: eVMCS: Filter out VM_EXIT_SAVE_VMX_PREEMPTION_TIMER Sasha Levin
2022-02-10 16:40 ` Paolo Bonzini
2022-02-09 18:57 ` [PATCH MANUALSEL 5.10 3/6] KVM: nVMX: Also filter MSR_IA32_VMX_TRUE_PINBASED_CTLS when eVMCS Sasha Levin
2022-02-10 16:40 ` Paolo Bonzini
2022-02-09 18:57 ` [PATCH MANUALSEL 5.10 4/6] KVM: nVMX: WARN on any attempt to allocate shadow VMCS for vmcs02 Sasha Levin
2022-02-10 16:35 ` Paolo Bonzini [this message]
2022-02-09 18:57 ` [PATCH MANUALSEL 5.10 5/6] KVM: SVM: Don't kill SEV guest if SMAP erratum triggers in usermode Sasha Levin
2022-02-10 16:40 ` Paolo Bonzini
2022-02-10 16:41 ` Paolo Bonzini
2022-02-09 18:57 ` [PATCH MANUALSEL 5.10 6/6] KVM: VMX: Set vmcs.PENDING_DBG.BS on #DB in STI/MOVSS blocking shadow Sasha Levin
2022-02-10 16:36 ` Paolo Bonzini
2022-02-10 16:40 ` [PATCH MANUALSEL 5.10 1/6] KVM: eventfd: Fix false positive RCU usage warning Paolo Bonzini
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=52ec7622-efcf-dfd6-2560-3114f90f7618@redhat.com \
--to=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=sashal@kernel.org \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox