From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: "Nick Desaulniers" <nick.desaulniers@gmail.com>,
"Radim Krčmář" <rkrcmar@redhat.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
x86@kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: x86: dynamically allocate large struct in em_fxrstor
Date: Thu, 25 May 2017 16:07:08 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <52f0d4a8-aacf-dc64-8117-2ba33bbfd928@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170525013653.dvxpczik77l6ogp7@lostoracle.net>
On 25/05/2017 03:36, Nick Desaulniers wrote:
>>> if (ctxt->mode < X86EMUL_MODE_PROT64)
>>> - rc = fxrstor_fixup(ctxt, &fx_state);
>>> + rc = fxrstor_fixup(ctxt, fx_state);
>> Ah, fxrstor_fixup most likely got inlined and both of them put ~512 byte
>> fxregs_state on the stack ... noinline attribute should solve the
>> warning too.
> While that would change fewer lines, doesn't the problem still exist in
> the case of `ctxt->mode < X86EMUL_MODE_PROT64`, just split across two
> stack frames? As in shouldn't we still dynamically allocate fx_state?
I think we should do the fixup backwards.
That is:
- first do get_fpu
- if the fixup is necessary, i.e. ctxt->mode < X86EMUL_MODE_PROT64, do
fxsave into &fxstate.
- then do segmented_read_std with the correct size, which is
- offsetof(struct fxregs_state, xmm_space[16]), i.e. 416
if ctxt->mode == X86EMUL_MODE_PROT64
- offsetof(struct fxregs_state, xmm_space[8]), i.e. 288
if ctxt->mode < X86EMUL_MODE_PROT64 and CR4.OSFXSR=1
- offsetof(struct fxregs_state, xmm_space[0]), i.e. 160
if ctxt->mode < X86EMUL_MODE_PROT64 and CR4.OSFXSR=0
- then check fx_state.mxcsr
- then do fxrstor
- finally do put_fpu
This will remove one of the two fxregs_state structs.
Paolo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-05-25 14:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-05-24 6:24 [PATCH] KVM: x86: dynamically allocate large struct in em_fxrstor Nick Desaulniers
2017-05-24 14:19 ` Radim Krčmář
2017-05-25 1:36 ` Nick Desaulniers
2017-05-25 14:07 ` Paolo Bonzini [this message]
2017-05-26 4:13 ` Nick Desaulniers
2017-05-26 7:18 ` Paolo Bonzini
2017-05-29 19:55 ` [PATCH v2] KVM: x86: avoid large stack allocations " Nick Desaulniers
2017-05-29 20:14 ` kbuild test robot
2017-05-29 20:29 ` Nick Desaulniers
2017-05-29 20:39 ` [PATCH v3] " Nick Desaulniers
2017-05-29 22:40 ` Nick Desaulniers
2017-05-29 22:48 ` [PATCH v4] " Nick Desaulniers
2017-05-30 10:15 ` Paolo Bonzini
2017-05-30 14:05 ` Radim Krčmář
2017-05-31 3:08 ` [PATCH v5] " Nick Desaulniers
2017-05-31 11:01 ` Paolo Bonzini
2017-06-01 1:05 ` Nick Desaulniers
2017-06-01 7:36 ` Paolo Bonzini
2017-06-02 2:10 ` Nick Desaulniers
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=52f0d4a8-aacf-dc64-8117-2ba33bbfd928@redhat.com \
--to=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=nick.desaulniers@gmail.com \
--cc=rkrcmar@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).