public inbox for kvm@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: walter harms <wharms@bfs.de>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>,
	Gleb Natapov <gleb@kernel.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	x86@kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
	kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch RFC] kvm, cpuid: silence a buffer overflow warning
Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2014 14:18:21 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5306009D.8040205@bfs.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5305FE1E.6060902@redhat.com>



Am 20.02.2014 14:07, schrieb Paolo Bonzini:
> Il 20/02/2014 13:34, Dan Carpenter ha scritto:
>> This seems like a harmless off by one overflow if "i" is the last
>> element in the vcpu->arch.cpuid_entries[] array.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
>> ---
>> Not tested.  I always wonder if it's worth fixing these or if it's worth
>> reporting them?  Either of those seem like a lot of work for something
>> harmless.
> 
> Could it oops if cpuid_nent is INT_MAX?  If so, it's not entirely harmless.
> In this case I'd rather take the occasion to cleanup the code like this
> (compile-tested):
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.c b/arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.c
> index 9fed5bedaad6..2fd6e7169936 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.c
> @@ -656,18 +656,19 @@ out:
>  static int move_to_next_stateful_cpuid_entry(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, int i)
>  {
>  	struct kvm_cpuid_entry2 *e = &vcpu->arch.cpuid_entries[i];
> -	int j, nent = vcpu->arch.cpuid_nent;
> +	struct kvm_cpuid_entry2 *ej;
> +	int j = i, nent = vcpu->arch.cpuid_nent;
>  
>  	e->flags &= ~KVM_CPUID_FLAG_STATE_READ_NEXT;
> +
>  	/* when no next entry is found, the current entry[i] is reselected */
> -	for (j = i + 1; ; j = (j + 1) % nent) {
> -		struct kvm_cpuid_entry2 *ej = &vcpu->arch.cpuid_entries[j];
> -		if (ej->function == e->function) {
> -			ej->flags |= KVM_CPUID_FLAG_STATE_READ_NEXT;
> -			return j;
> -		}
> -	}
> -	return 0; /* silence gcc, even though control never reaches here */
> +	do {
> +		j = (j + 1) % nent;
> +		ej = &vcpu->arch.cpuid_entries[j];
> +	} while (ej->function != e->function);
> +
> +	ej->flags |= KVM_CPUID_FLAG_STATE_READ_NEXT;
> +	return j;
>  }
>  
>  /* find an entry with matching function, matching index (if needed), and that
> 
> What do you think?
> 

Is there any guaranty that this will not loop forever ?

an if (i==j) return 0; would be on the save side. (I guess that
these was the idea behind the for).

re,
 wh

> Paolo
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2014-02-20 13:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-02-20 12:34 [patch RFC] kvm, cpuid: silence a buffer overflow warning Dan Carpenter
2014-02-20 13:07 ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-02-20 13:18   ` walter harms [this message]
2014-02-20 13:19     ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-02-20 13:23   ` Dan Carpenter

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5306009D.8040205@bfs.de \
    --to=wharms@bfs.de \
    --cc=dan.carpenter@oracle.com \
    --cc=gleb@kernel.org \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox