From: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>
To: Marius Vlad <mv@sec.uni-passau.de>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kvm-unit-tests: Fix GCC's 4.8 labels as values for nVMX tests.
Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2014 16:58:45 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <530B6C35.2090605@siemens.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1393255552-7147-1-git-send-email-mv@sec.uni-passau.de>
On 2014-02-24 16:25, Marius Vlad wrote:
> Commit 3b1274463fa8d074dd3bc77efe25b59a4ddd491e uses GCCs extension
> labels as values to handle exceptions, but GCC 4.8 ``mistakingly''
> uses the next body function as a jump label, for functions which
> do not return. Fixed by returning a int value for those functions.
>
> See http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.emulators.kvm.devel/119186
>
> Signed-off-by: Marius Vlad <mv@sec.uni-passau.de>
> ---
> x86/vmx.c | 10 +++++-----
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/x86/vmx.c b/x86/vmx.c
> index fe950e6..0c895af 100644
> --- a/x86/vmx.c
> +++ b/x86/vmx.c
> @@ -548,7 +548,7 @@ static void exception_handler(struct ex_regs *regs)
> regs->rip = (u64)exception_return;
> }
>
> -static int test_for_exception(unsigned int ex, void (*func)(void))
> +static int test_for_exception(unsigned int ex, int (*func)(void))
> {
> handle_exception(ex, exception_handler);
> exception = false;
> @@ -557,23 +557,23 @@ static int test_for_exception(unsigned int ex, void (*func)(void))
> return exception;
> }
>
> -static void do_vmxon_off(void)
> +static int do_vmxon_off(void)
> {
> exception_return = &&resume;
> barrier();
> vmx_on();
> vmx_off();
> resume:
> - return;
> + return 0;
> }
>
> -static void do_write_feature_control(void)
> +static int do_write_feature_control(void)
> {
> exception_return = &&resume;
> barrier();
> wrmsr(MSR_IA32_FEATURE_CONTROL, 0);
> resume:
> - return;
> + return 0;
> }
>
> static int test_vmx_feature_control(void)
>
Argh, getting old. I remembered that issue but forgot that I already had
a fix for this queued:
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.emulators.kvm.devel/117866
I don't mind which version to pick, but maybe Paolo has mine already in
his queue.
Sorry for the duplicate work.
Jan
--
Siemens AG, Corporate Technology, CT RTC ITP SES-DE
Corporate Competence Center Embedded Linux
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-02-24 15:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-02-24 15:25 [PATCH] kvm-unit-tests: Fix GCC's 4.8 labels as values for nVMX tests Marius Vlad
2014-02-24 15:58 ` Jan Kiszka [this message]
2014-02-24 17:09 ` Marius Vlad
2014-02-25 14:26 ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-02-25 15:05 ` Jan Kiszka
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=530B6C35.2090605@siemens.com \
--to=jan.kiszka@siemens.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mv@sec.uni-passau.de \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).