From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: Stefan Bader <stefan.bader@canonical.com>, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Anthoine Bourgeois <bourgeois@bertin.fr>
Subject: Re: nVMX regression v3.13+, bisected
Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2014 21:25:29 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <530E4DB9.5050001@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <530E43EC.7000600@canonical.com>
Il 26/02/2014 20:43, Stefan Bader ha scritto:
> Hi,
>
> I was looking at a bug report[1] about a regression on nested VMX that started
> with kernel v3.13 (same issue still existed with v3.14-rc4). The problem shows
> up when running a v3.13 kernel in L0 and then trying to launch a L2 (L1 was
> either a v3.2 kernel or v3.13, so seemed to have no immediate influence). L2 is
> trying to boot a iso image and hangs before the isolinux boot loader displays
> anything. A preinstalled hd image fails to boot, too.
>
> I bisected this and ended up on the following commit which, when reverted made
> the launch work again:
>
> Author: Anthoine Bourgeois <bourgeois@bertin.fr>
> Date: Wed Nov 13 11:45:37 2013 +0100
>
> kvm, vmx: Fix lazy FPU on nested guest
>
> If a nested guest does a NM fault but its CR0 doesn't contain the TS
> flag (because it was already cleared by the guest with L1 aid) then we
> have to activate FPU ourselves in L0 and then continue to L2. If TS flag
> is set then we fallback on the previous behavior, forward the fault to
> L1 if it asked for.
>
> Signed-off-by: Anthoine Bourgeois <bourgeois@bertin.fr>
> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
>
> The condition to exit to L0 seems to be according to what the description says.
> Could it be that the handling in L0 is doing something wrong?
Thanks, I'll look at it tomorrow or Friday.
Paolo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-02-26 20:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-02-26 19:43 nVMX regression v3.13+, bisected Stefan Bader
2014-02-26 20:25 ` Paolo Bonzini [this message]
2014-02-26 20:27 ` Stefan Bader
2014-02-26 20:44 ` Kashyap Chamarthy
2014-02-27 12:10 ` Kashyap Chamarthy
2014-02-27 15:55 ` Kashyap Chamarthy
2014-02-27 10:51 ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-02-27 13:41 ` anthoine.bourgeois
2014-02-27 17:01 ` anthoine.bourgeois
2014-02-27 16:58 ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-02-27 21:34 ` Kashyap Chamarthy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=530E4DB9.5050001@redhat.com \
--to=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=bourgeois@bertin.fr \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stefan.bader@canonical.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).