From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: =?UTF-8?B?VGltaCBCZXJnc3Ryw7Zt?= Subject: Re: Is there any other KVM mailing lists? Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2014 21:37:46 +0100 Message-ID: <530FA21A.2070109@shiwebs.net> References: <530EEB1D.6050607@shiwebs.net> <530F6F9F.90407@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org To: Paolo Bonzini Return-path: Received: from li189-143.members.linode.com ([178.79.133.143]:33909 "EHLO vishnu.shiwebs.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750904AbaB0Uhs (ORCPT ); Thu, 27 Feb 2014 15:37:48 -0500 In-Reply-To: <530F6F9F.90407@redhat.com> Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Thanks, I'll check them out. I do not mean 'Spam' as in junk-mail, but spam as in many mails, figure= =20 of speech. //T On tor 27 feb 2014 18:02:23, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > Il 27/02/2014 08:37, Timh Bergstr=C3=B6m ha scritto: >> I'm specifically looking for a KVM mailing list that has more >> discussions about KVM based solutions and similar, and less developm= ent >> spam/patches? > > You probably want to look for oVirt or OpenStack mailing list or blog= =2E > Those are the two main management interfaces for KVM. There are also > others, such as virt-manager or Ganeti. > > This one is specifically for development of the hypervisor, and bug > reports about it from the community. > > So, it's quite exactly the opposite of spam. Without this mailing > list, KVM would not exist. > > Paolo > -- //T