From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jan Kiszka Subject: Re: 3.10.X kernel/jump_label kvm Date: Tue, 04 Mar 2014 12:21:03 +0100 Message-ID: <5315B71F.10901@siemens.com> References: <5310E7E8.1040508@profihost.ag> <5314AF7B.10903@redhat.com> <5314C752.1070407@profihost.ag> <5315A46E.7000509@siemens.com> <5315AA6C.9010000@profihost.ag> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG , Paolo Bonzini , kvm@vger.kernel.org Return-path: Received: from david.siemens.de ([192.35.17.14]:40941 "EHLO david.siemens.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756666AbaCDLVL (ORCPT ); Tue, 4 Mar 2014 06:21:11 -0500 In-Reply-To: <5315AA6C.9010000@profihost.ag> Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 2014-03-04 11:26, Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG wrote: > Am 04.03.2014 11:01, schrieb Jan Kiszka: >> On 2014-03-03 19:17, Stefan Priebe wrote: >>> >>> Am 03.03.2014 17:36, schrieb Paolo Bonzini: >>>> Il 28/02/2014 20:47, Stefan Priebe ha scritto: >>>>> Hello, >>>>> >>>>> i got this stack trace multiple times while using a vanilla 3.10.32 >>>>> kernel and already sent it to the list in december but got no replies. >>>> >>>> Please try the patch of commit 0dce7cd67fd9055c4a2ff278f8af1431e646d346: >>> >>> Thanks - will try it. So this one should also go into 3.10.X >> >> It's part of 3.10.29. Only .26..28 were affected by the regression below. >> >> Jan > > HI Jan, > > but i'm using 3.10.32. So it is another bug i'm seeing? Yes, that's the logical consequence. Jan -- Siemens AG, Corporate Technology, CT RTC ITP SES-DE Corporate Competence Center Embedded Linux