From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Paolo Bonzini Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] Revert "KVM: PPC: Book3S HV: Add new state for transactional memory" Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2014 11:51:35 +0100 Message-ID: <531D9937.5010705@redhat.com> References: <1394102170-22126-1-git-send-email-aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20140310105028.GA5934@iris.ozlabs.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: agraf@suse.de, benh@kernel.crashing.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org To: Paul Mackerras , "Aneesh Kumar K.V" , Scott Wood Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20140310105028.GA5934@iris.ozlabs.ibm.com> Sender: kvm-ppc-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: kvm.vger.kernel.org Il 10/03/2014 11:50, Paul Mackerras ha scritto: > We can either do this revert, or apply a patch removing the extra > hunk, but one or the other should go in for 3.14 since it's quite > broken as it is (that is, HV-mode KVM on powerpc is broken). > > Paolo, do you have a preference about revert vs. fix? Are you happy > to take what Aneesh sent (in which case please add my acked-by and > perhaps edit the commentary to say how the problem arose), or do you > want a freshly-prepared patch, and if so against which branch? I prefer a fix. Paolo