From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PULL 4/4] KVM: s390: clear local interrupts at cpu initial reset
Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2014 14:56:53 +0100
Message-ID: <53318B25.9070805@redhat.com>
References: <1395754523-43697-1-git-send-email-borntraeger@de.ibm.com> <1395754523-43697-5-git-send-email-borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: KVM <kvm@vger.kernel.org>, linux-s390 <linux-s390@vger.kernel.org>,
	Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com>,
	Jens Freimann <jfrei@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
Return-path: <kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:17519 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1752360AbaCYN5C (ORCPT <rfc822;kvm@vger.kernel.org>);
	Tue, 25 Mar 2014 09:57:02 -0400
In-Reply-To: <1395754523-43697-5-git-send-email-borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <kvm.vger.kernel.org>

Il 25/03/2014 14:35, Christian Borntraeger ha scritto:
> +	spin_lock_bh(&li->lock);
> +	list_for_each_entry_safe(inti, n, &li->list, list) {
> +		list_del(&inti->list);
> +		kfree(inti);
> +	}
> +	atomic_set(&li->active, 0);
> +	spin_unlock_bh(&li->lock);
> +}

Out of curiosity, why the _bh?

Paolo