From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Paolo Bonzini Subject: Preparing kvm/next for first pull request of 3.15 merge window Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2014 18:29:45 +0100 Message-ID: <5331BD09.6090806@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: "kvm@vger.kernel.org" , kvm-ppc , Marc Zyngier , Christoffer Dall , Alexander Graf , Scott Wood , Paul Mackerras Return-path: Received: from mail-ee0-f50.google.com ([74.125.83.50]:38388 "EHLO mail-ee0-f50.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754841AbaCYR3u (ORCPT ); Tue, 25 Mar 2014 13:29:50 -0400 Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Hi all, I've pushed the last set of updates to kvm/next for the 3.15 merge window. I don't expect any other changes for either x86 or s390 (thanks Christian!). The pull request is already pretty beefy. I would like to know from ARM and PPC maintainers *now* (before the merge window opens) what will be in 3.15. Also, PPC guys, please make sure the pull requests will be based on commit e724f080f5dd (KVM: PPC: Book3S HV: Fix register usage when loading/saving VRSAVE, 2014-03-13). Also, the pull requests I got in the last couple of months were a bit messy, and I'm already fearing that Linus notices. In the future, I'll tag kvm-3.x-base (e.g. kvm-3.16-base) when I open kvm/next, and I will *reject* pull requests from submaintainers that include extra non-KVM commits without a very good reason. Palo