From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christian Borntraeger Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] KVM call agenda for 2014-04-01 Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2014 15:21:53 +0200 Message-ID: <53396BF1.1050605@de.ibm.com> References: <87mwg6ejn8.fsf@elfo.mitica> <533948B3.2070009@suse.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: Peter Maydell , Stefan Hajnoczi , Anthony Liguori , Anthony Liguori , Bruce Rogers To: =?ISO-8859-15?Q?Andreas_F=E4rber?= , quintela@redhat.com, KVM devel mailing list , qemu list Return-path: Received: from e06smtp11.uk.ibm.com ([195.75.94.107]:58382 "EHLO e06smtp11.uk.ibm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751310AbaCaNWA (ORCPT ); Mon, 31 Mar 2014 09:22:00 -0400 Received: from /spool/local by e06smtp11.uk.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Mon, 31 Mar 2014 14:21:58 +0100 Received: from b06cxnps4076.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06relay13.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.109.198]) by d06dlp03.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36B331B0804B for ; Mon, 31 Mar 2014 14:21:51 +0100 (BST) Received: from d06av10.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06av10.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.37.251]) by b06cxnps4076.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id s2VDLi8k66715772 for ; Mon, 31 Mar 2014 13:21:44 GMT Received: from d06av10.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by d06av10.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/NCO v10.0 AVout) with ESMTP id s2VDLsWn001646 for ; Mon, 31 Mar 2014 07:21:55 -0600 In-Reply-To: <533948B3.2070009@suse.de> Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 31/03/14 12:51, Andreas F=E4rber wrote: > Hi, >=20 > Am 31.03.2014 12:40, schrieb Juan Quintela: >> >> Please, send any topic that you are interested in covering. >=20 > I would like to discuss the state of the QEMU release process, please= : >=20 > * -rc1 has not been tagged. > * Who besides Anthony could upload a tarball if we tag and create it? > * make-release fix for SeaBIOS on the list. Ping, and are more affect= ed? +1 for this one. Another thing might be the release process in general. Currently it see= ms that everybody tries to push everything just before the hard freeze. I= had to debug some problems introduced _after_ soft freeze. Is there some interest in having a Linux-like process (merge window + stabilization)?= This would require shorter release cycles of course. Christian