From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] KVM call agenda for 2014-04-01
Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2014 16:28:18 +0200
Message-ID: <53397B82.4050907@redhat.com>
References: <87mwg6ejn8.fsf@elfo.mitica>	<533948B3.2070009@suse.de>	<53396BF1.1050605@de.ibm.com>	<CAFEAcA-wNz0aA6fSGtybgew8VbaPs2nOz4O8yGOQ_bPcWc1-tg@mail.gmail.com> <CA+aC4ktWoppcXX2_h_9XVtGs=jnLVpipFQNBCfxABQ1VLXR9+A@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>,
	=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Andrea?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?s_F=E4rber?=
	<afaerber@suse.de>, Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>,
	KVM devel mailing list <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
	qemu list <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>,
	Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>,
	Anthony Liguori <aliguori@amazon.com>,
	Bruce Rogers <brogers@suse.com>
To: Anthony Liguori <anthony@codemonkey.ws>,
	Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Return-path: <kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mail-wi0-f172.google.com ([209.85.212.172]:47773 "EHLO
	mail-wi0-f172.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1752381AbaCaO2X (ORCPT <rfc822;kvm@vger.kernel.org>);
	Mon, 31 Mar 2014 10:28:23 -0400
Received: by mail-wi0-f172.google.com with SMTP id hi2so1969485wib.5
        for <kvm@vger.kernel.org>; Mon, 31 Mar 2014 07:28:22 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CA+aC4ktWoppcXX2_h_9XVtGs=jnLVpipFQNBCfxABQ1VLXR9+A@mail.gmail.com>
Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <kvm.vger.kernel.org>

Il 31/03/2014 16:01, Anthony Liguori ha scritto:
>> > "merge window" has been suggested before. I think it would be
>> > a terrible idea for QEMU, personally. We're not the kernel in
>> > many ways, notably dev community size and a greater tendency
>> > to changes that have effects across the whole tree.
>> >
>> > Soft + hard freeze is our stabilization period currently.
> Peter, are you willing to do the tagging and announcement for the 2.0
> rcs?  I sent instructions privately and between stefanha and I we can
> get your permissions sorted out.

I think it would be a good idea to separate the committer and release 
manager roles.  Peter is providing the community with a wonderful 
service, just like you were; putting too much work on his shoulders 
risks getting us in the same situation if anything were to affect his 
ability to provide it.

Paolo