From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christian Borntraeger Subject: Re: [PATCH/RFC] KVM: s390: Add S390 configuration and control kvm device Date: Tue, 01 Apr 2014 17:04:51 +0200 Message-ID: <533AD593.5020804@de.ibm.com> References: <1396363663-50450-1-git-send-email-borntraeger@de.ibm.com> <1396363663-50450-2-git-send-email-borntraeger@de.ibm.com> <533AD42D.8060504@suse.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: qemu-devel , KVM , linux-s390 , Cornelia Huck , Michael Mueller , Ekaterina Tumanova , Jens Freimann To: Alexander Graf Return-path: Received: from e06smtp18.uk.ibm.com ([195.75.94.114]:45040 "EHLO e06smtp18.uk.ibm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751277AbaDAPE5 (ORCPT ); Tue, 1 Apr 2014 11:04:57 -0400 Received: from /spool/local by e06smtp18.uk.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Tue, 1 Apr 2014 16:04:55 +0100 In-Reply-To: <533AD42D.8060504@suse.de> Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 01/04/14 16:58, Alexander Graf wrote: > On 04/01/2014 04:47 PM, Christian Borntraeger wrote: >> From: Ekaterina Tumanova >> >> Add KVM_DEV_TYPE_S390_CONFIG kvm device that contains >> configuration and control attributes of particular vm. >> The device is created by KVM_CREATE_DEVICE ioctl. >> The attributes may be retrieved and stored by calling >> KVM_GET_DEVICE_ATTR and KVM_SET_DEVICE_ATTR ioctls. >> >> Signed-off-by: Ekaterina Tumanova >> Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger > > I don't think a device is particularly the best fit. A device can usually be instantiated multiple times. The configuration device can only be created once. A device also gets created by user space which enables it to receive the fd to drive it. Your device has to be created during VM creation. I remember some discussion a year or 2 ago, and IIRC a config device was actually your idea ;-) (The other idea that we had, was ONE_REG for the VM) > > I think VM configuration is common enough to just make this a separate interface. So you propose to define a new base ioctl (e.g. VM_REG) on the vm fd, instead? Seems like an easy enough change. Would you reuse the kvm_attr structure for that? > > > Alex >