From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [patch 2/2] target-i386: block migration and savevm if invariant
 tsc is exposed
Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2014 16:42:33 -0400
Message-ID: <53597739.9000402@redhat.com>
References: <20140422191042.005048158@amt.cnet> <20140422191200.416302523@amt.cnet> <20140422203807.GJ3363@otherpad.lan.raisama.net> <20140422212759.GB28571@amt.cnet> <20140423011444.GL3363@otherpad.lan.raisama.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org,
	Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>,
	=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Andreas_F=E4rber?= <afaerber@suse.de>
To: Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com>,
	Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
Return-path: <kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mail-ee0-f42.google.com ([74.125.83.42]:55203 "EHLO
	mail-ee0-f42.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1751385AbaDXUmf (ORCPT <rfc822;kvm@vger.kernel.org>);
	Thu, 24 Apr 2014 16:42:35 -0400
Received: by mail-ee0-f42.google.com with SMTP id d17so2243967eek.1
        for <kvm@vger.kernel.org>; Thu, 24 Apr 2014 13:42:33 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <20140423011444.GL3363@otherpad.lan.raisama.net>
Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <kvm.vger.kernel.org>

Il 22/04/2014 21:14, Eduardo Habkost ha scritto:
> Not for "-cpu host". If somebody needs migration to work, they shouldn't
> be using "-cpu host" anyway (I don't know if you have seen the other
> comments in my message?).

I'm not entirely sure.  If you have hosts with exactly identical 
chipsets, "-cpu host" migration will in all likelihood work.  Marcelo's 
approach is safer.

Paolo