Re: [PATCH 14/21] MIPS: KVM: Add nanosecond count bias KVM register

Paolo Bonzini
2014-04-26T09:37:29Z

Il 26/04/2014 00:34, James Hogan ha scritto:
> So yes, you could technically manage without (4) by using (2) ((4) was
> implemented first), but I think it probably still has some value since you can
> do it with a single ioctl rather than 4 ioctls (freeze timer, read
> resume_time, read or write count, unfreeze timer).
>
> Enough value to be worthwhile? I haven't really made up my mind yet but I'm
> leaning towards yes.

It would be interesting to see how the userspace patches use this
independent of COUNT_RESUME.

Paolo