From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: James Hogan Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/12] kvm tools: Misc patches (mips support) Date: Tue, 20 May 2014 22:25:11 +0100 Message-ID: <537BC837.7030507@imgtec.com> References: <1400518411-9759-1-git-send-email-andreas.herrmann@caviumnetworks.com> <537B3A8E.70801@imgtec.com> <537B966E.9000708@iki.fi> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: David Daney , , To: Pekka Enberg , Andreas Herrmann , Pekka Enberg Return-path: Received: from mailapp01.imgtec.com ([195.59.15.196]:12250 "EHLO mailapp01.imgtec.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750754AbaETV3A (ORCPT ); Tue, 20 May 2014 17:29:00 -0400 In-Reply-To: <537B966E.9000708@iki.fi> Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 20/05/14 18:52, Pekka Enberg wrote: > On 05/20/2014 02:20 PM, James Hogan wrote: >> I don't know what Pekka's policy is for kvm tools, but to avoid >> confusion I'd like to make clear that this patchset depends on a KVM >> implementation (KVM_VM_TYPE==1 for VZ) which hasn't been accepted into >> the mainline kernel yet. > > Is that something that is likely to end up in mainline Linux in one form > or another? If yes, we can merge early like we did with arm64. Very likely yes, and most of the specifics of the MIPS KVM API have already been pinned down for the trap & emulate KVM support which is in mainline. Cheers James