From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Paolo Bonzini Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] kvm: Enable -cpu option to hide KVM Date: Mon, 02 Jun 2014 09:09:51 +0200 Message-ID: <538C233F.5030106@redhat.com> References: <20140601162414.28708.22775.stgit@bling.home> <538B70FF.6050103@redhat.com> <1401657070.9207.6.camel@ul30vt.home> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org To: Alex Williamson Return-path: Received: from mail-we0-f174.google.com ([74.125.82.174]:40815 "EHLO mail-we0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751431AbaFBHJ7 (ORCPT ); Mon, 2 Jun 2014 03:09:59 -0400 Received: by mail-we0-f174.google.com with SMTP id k48so4639275wev.19 for ; Mon, 02 Jun 2014 00:09:57 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <1401657070.9207.6.camel@ul30vt.home> Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Il 01/06/2014 23:11, Alex Williamson ha scritto: >> > >> > It's really a nit, but I think "kvm=no" is preferrable (more consistent >> > with how hyper-v leaves are enabled). > Happy to oblige, but I'm not sure what I'm looking for. We enably > hyper-v leaves if hyperv_enabled(), which seems to boil down to the kvm > kernel supporting KVM_CAP_HYPERV and one or more cpu->hyperv_foo > features enabled. What's the commandline option I'm looking for that > has some sort of hyper-v=on|off? Thanks, Same as your "no-kvm", just with the default flipped from false to true. Paolo