From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] Prepare for in-kernel VFIO DMA operations acceleration
Date: Thu, 05 Jun 2014 13:57:08 +0200
Message-ID: <53905B14.5020204@suse.de>
References: <1401953144-19186-1-git-send-email-aik@ozlabs.ru>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
	Gleb Natapov <gleb@kernel.org>,
	Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org
To: Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik@ozlabs.ru>, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Return-path: <kvm-ppc-owner@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <1401953144-19186-1-git-send-email-aik@ozlabs.ru>
Sender: kvm-ppc-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: kvm.vger.kernel.org


On 05.06.14 09:25, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
> This reserves 2 capability numbers.
>
> This implements an extended version of KVM_CREATE_SPAPR_TCE_64 ioctl.
>
> Please advise how to proceed with these patches as I suspect that
> first two should go via Paolo's tree while the last one via Alex Graf's tree
> (correct?).

They would just go via my tree, but only be actually allocated (read: 
mergable to qemu) when they hit Paolo's tree.

In fact, I don't think it makes sense to split them off at all.


Alex