From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Paolo Bonzini Subject: Re: [RFC 0/2] GET_EMULATED_CPUID support with "allow-emulation" option Date: Thu, 05 Jun 2014 18:44:03 +0200 Message-ID: <53909E53.9050300@redhat.com> References: <1401984741-26882-1-git-send-email-ehabkost@redhat.com> <539099B6.2090000@suse.de> <53909A41.1060800@redhat.com> <53909D79.1070609@suse.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Borislav Petkov , "Gabriel L. Somlo" , kvm@vger.kernel.org, "Michael S. Tsirkin" , Michael Mueller , Christian Borntraeger , "Jason J. Herne" , =?UTF-8?B?QW5kcmVhcyBGw6RyYmVy?= To: Alexander Graf , Eduardo Habkost , qemu-devel@nongnu.org Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:15693 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751676AbaFEQo3 (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Jun 2014 12:44:29 -0400 In-Reply-To: <53909D79.1070609@suse.de> Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Il 05/06/2014 18:40, Alexander Graf ha scritto: > > > kvm_set_cpuid(cpuid); > > but enabling all experimental features inside KVM just because we want > one or two of them is very counter-intuitive. Imagine we'd introduce > emulation support for AVX. Suddenly allow-emulation (which I'd need for > Mac OS X 10.5) would enable AVX as well which I really don't want enabled. Only if you were using "-cpu somethingThatHasAVX", though, no? Paolo